Some realistic downside projections: U3: 17-21%; U6: 30-37%.
Best case scenario: U3: 14-17%; U6: 26-31%
And here is what Bernanke, and everyone else who wonders where we are headed, should be looking at:
“If the job market does not turn around by late summer or early fall of 2009, the projections easily exceed the Great Depression. At that point the only way to prevent catastrophic economic conditions would be through massive inflation of the US dollar achieved by either congress allowing the Federal Reserve to issue its own debt, or by accelerating the rate at which the Federal Reserve monetizes US debt while funneling the newly printed dollars into wages so that the money can circulate within the economy.”
Yes, wage inflation is wonderful, however recent data indicate that just the opposite is happening, and the only people who have seen their base pay increase are, ironically, Wall Street bankers, however, at the expense of losing their bonuses. Which is why bank excess reserves are likely to continue skyrocketing as literally boxes full of cash continue gathering dust, while a deleveraging consumer spends his money on guns and ammo.
And here, for some more data on why the unemployment number, is for the most part, rubbish.
Bank failure # 37 for the year was Bank of Lincolnwood, Lincolnwood, Illinois. Republic Bank of Chicago, Oak Brook, Illinois will assume all the deposits.
As of May 26, 2009, Bank of Lincolnwood had total assets of approximately $214 million and total deposits of $202 million. Republic Bank of Chicago agreed to purchase approximately $162 million in assets. The FDIC will retain the remaining assets for later disposition.
The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund will be $83 million. Republic Bank of Chicago’s acquisition of all the deposits was the “least costly” resolution for the DIF compared to alternatives. Bank of Lincolnwood is the 37th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year and the sixth in Illinois. The last bank to fail in the state was Citizens National Bank, Macomb, on May 22, 2009.
Does anyone even care about this data anymore? There obviously isnt one bank in the US which, on a long enough timeline, won’t fail.
Looks like even the FDIC is flexing its perfectly inelastic supply curve in Commercial Real Estate Loans. After selling a whopping 1,328 performing and non-performing loans in March for $218 million (a 54% discount), the FDIC sold just 315 loans in April for $177 million, a 40% discount. Presumably the investors who have purchased these loans are ineligible for PPIP or else they would know they could have purchased everything at par and paid less than half in equity, resulting in much better IRRs (to themselves, not taxpayers). A novel development for this month, is that in addition to long-time fan of the FDIC loan auction process Beal Bank (LNV), now Colony Capital has also joined in the bidding fray (under Matrix Advisors LLC in the list below). It is notable that all of Colony’s loan auctions were won at exactly the same bid: 67.1% of par. Something is definitely quite odd about this result. Reader feedback is welcome.
Compliments of a much happier and much less Merrill “Is that the most bullish piece you can come up with” Lynch-supervised David Rosenberg.
We have to put the data into perspective. Before the Lehman collapse, when equities were in a moderate bear market and bonds in a moderate bull market, the worst nonfarm payroll result we saw was -175,000. We don’t seem to recall too many pundits rejoicing over employment declines at that time, which were basically half of what was just posted in May. Moreover, the worst nonfarm payroll number in the 2001 recession — right after 9-11 — was -325,000; and before that, at the depths of the 1990-91 recession, the worst report showed a -306,000 print. So basically, what we saw today was a number consistent with a deep recession — just not quite as deep as the near-6% at an annual rate contraction we saw in the first quarter. It is difficult to rejoice over an employment data that is consistent with real GDP still declining anywhere from a 2% to 4% at an annual rate. Now here we are, close to nine months after the Lehman collapse, and we are still printing employment numbers that are double what they were before pre-Lehman. That is the bigger picture.
Moreover, the internals of today’s report, in a word, were awful. Not only are businesses still cutting jobs but they are also reducing the hours that their employees are working; the private workweek hit a new record low of 33.1 hours (from 33.2 hours in April). So, total labour input was much weaker than the headline payroll suggests and this is vividly illustrated in the aggregate-hours worked index, which fell 0.7% MoM and something ‘green shoot’ advocates will not like discuss since this was actually worse than the 0.3% MoM drop in April; this takes the three-month trend to a -8.6% annual rate. Think about that for a moment because what goes into GDP is total hours worked and productivity — so the latter better continue to hang in there or else we are going to be seeing some nasty output data going forward that may well take Mr. Market by surprise. Put another way, if companies had held hours worked constant in May instead of cutting them, to achieve the total labour input they achieved last month would have required — get…
And I thought last month was bad. Total consumer credit in April dropped by almost $15 billion to just above $2.5 trillion, on expectations of -$6 billion, a 7.4% annual rate reduction. As for the March revision, it just does not compute how manipulated higher that number initially was.
Someone tell that house of dimon SPY permabid that consumer credit down -> savings up -> economy bad.
Also, when it seems like Steve is about to crack in “explaining how we live and how the system is set up”, Melissa storms to the front, providing that critical second wind of intellectual superstardom. Michael Pento must still be shell-shocked from that episode.
Courtesy of Shah Gilani, Contributing Editor Money Morning
Inside Wall Street: Does a Potential New Wall Street Pandemic Fester Underneath Apparent BlackRock Conflicts?
The U.S. Treasury Department recently announced it has preliminarily granted BlackRock Inc. (NYSE: BLK), a mega-money-management and risk-advisory firm, a second-round interview to potentially buy toxic assets from beleaguered U.S. banks. The Treasury’s plan was to let a chosen few investment firms borrow cheaply from the Fed in order to massively leverage up their capital pools to purchase toxic assets, and then to backstop almost all potential losses with taxpayer money. This plan was itself crafted in large measure with help from BlackRock. It’s as if the moral hazards of cronyism, leverage, laissez-faire government and the doctrine of too-big-to-fail never happened.
The Background on BlackRock
In 1988, The Blackstone Group LP (NYSE: BX) - then a young-and-aggressive leveraged buyout shop that would eventually go public and is now the largest private equity company in the world - bankrolled a small asset-management startup called Financial Management Group. Heralding its roots out of Blackstone, Financial Management Group later changed its name to BlackRock. BlackRock was originally run by Ralph L. Schlosstein, a former Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (OTC: LEHMQ) managing director of the mortgage-backed bond group, who stepped down as BlackRock’s president last year, and Laurence D. Fink, a former First Boston Group [now part of giant Credit Suisse Group AG (NYSE ADR: CS)] and a master-of-the-universe, fixed-income mortgage trader. That the expertise of the firm’s founders was in mortgage-backed securities is hardly ironic in this story. As it happens, the story goes that Fink was one of the early pioneers at First Boston who helped create collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) out of fairly transparent mortgage-backed securities. Collateralized mortgage obligations, not unlike a virus, eventually yielded a whole host of spin-off products, now collectively lumped under the banner of collateralized debt obligations, or CDOs.
For the most part, CDOs are like IEDs (improvised explosive devices) strewn along the road of once-straightforward securitized products. Sometime, in the not-too-distant future, when you look up the term "toxic assets" in your Barron’s "Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms," the definition will include a picture of the collateralized debt obligation family of products. In 1994, Blackstone sold BlackRock to PNC Bank Corp. (NYSE: PNC), and in 1999 BlackRock went public (PNC still holds a 34% stake in BlackRock). Also in 1999, under Fink’s watchful eye, BlackRock Solutions was formed to provide…
A Chinese proverb known by Americans as the “Chinese curse” says: “may you live in interesting times”. Boy do we live in interesting times. This is a veritable golden age in economic evolution. New theories are being crafted as we speak and old theories that have stood the test of (our short) economic time are being torn down. No theory has come under fire in recent years like Keynesianism. After decades of success, Keynesianism doesn’t appear to be having the same magical effect. Economic theorists are confused. To their dismay (and with all apologies to Sir John Templeton, to whom I promised I would never utter these words) – it&r...
10:44 02/09 EU ALMUNIA: SUPPORT SHOULD BE IN RETURN FOR GREEK EFFORTS10:43 02/09 EU ALMUNIA: WANTS EU LEADERS TO SAY THEY WILL SUPPORT GREECE10:41 02/09 EU ALMUNIA: CURRENT SITUATION MOST DIFFICULT SINCE EMU START10:41 02/09 EU ALMUNIA: EU SPECIAL SUMMIT THURSDAY V IMPORTANT10:40 02/09 EU ALMUNIA: NEED TO REESTABLISH CONFIDENCE IN EMU, EURO10:34 02/09 EU ALMUNIA: NEED TO INCREASE COORDINATION IN EURO ZONE10:36 02/09 EU ALMUNIA: EMU CAN AND SHOULD SOLVE GREECE BY OURSELVES
Is The Market Following A Script?
If you ask Elliott it is.
From Our Recent Blog:
"There is also a good possibility that the whole move down off the January highs traces out ABCDE (5 Waves down before all said and done). But we'll take it a step at a time."
The S&P 500 chart below has more of a 3 waves (abc) look to it just like we talked about in advance to be on the lookout for. The only problem was it's prime entry took place in the form of a gap and within minutes traced out the bulk of Thursday's move. But still it's all about trends and it's locked in a downtrend channel.
One look at last week's action in the OTC Composite below (remember this area of the...
"If the US were a corporation, it would have bonds that are junk rated."
That's the word from Marc Faber but, then again, his column is called the "Gloom, Boom, Doom Report" so he is very much talking his book. Faber makes the case that our unfunded liabilities make the US a toxic investment, much the way GM health and pension obligations. The US ended up bailing out GM but who can bail out the US? Faber argues that additional debt growth no longer has the ability to add to GDP growth, meaning we have passed a tipping point where we have no choice but to pay off existing debt (most likely through inflation) or default.
I apologize for missing the last few days. I have been really busy with some other projects. So, to make it up to you, I have three picks for today. ...
BAC – Bank of America Corp. – Bearish option traders purchased put options on Bank of America today with shares of the firm trading 3% lower to $14.52. The number of put options purchased at the March $14 strike price surpassed existing open interest at that strike, suggesting many investors are bracing for continued near-term share price erosion. Approximately 33,000 puts were purchased for an average premium of $0.59 apiece at the March $14 strike. Investors picking up the put options perhaps anticipate B of A’s share price could slip beneath the effective breakeven point on the trade at $13.41 ahead of March expiration. The 12% increase in the reading of options implied volatility on Bank of America to 43.74% today points to increased fluctuation in the...
After a brief respite last week, insider buying and selling trends returned to their regularly scheduled bearishness. The recent market dip has not attracted many buyers to the market as total insider buying for the latest week totaled just $10.2MM. Total selling surged to $490MM from last week’s reading of $250.1MM.
The insider selling and buying trends continue to reflect the low level of confidence that insiders have in the future performance of their own shares. This has been best reflected in the continuing weak trends in the labor markets and the...
Philip R. Davis is a founder Phil's Stock World, a stock and options trading site that teaches the art of options trading to newcomers and devises advanced strategies for expert traders...
Ilene is editor and affiliate program
coordinator for PSW. She manages the Favorites backup site
(blogroll, archives,
more).
Contact Ilene to learn about our affiliate and
content sharing
programs.