Courtesy of Benzinga.
The United States Polo Association, Inc. (“USPA”), the governing body of the
sport of polo in the United States since 1890, today announced that the United
States District Court in the Southern District of New York (“SDNY”) has
granted its motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by Ralph Lauren Corporation
(“RLC”) and RLC’s subsidiaries, PRL USA Holdings, Inc. (“PRL”) and Polo/Lauren
Company, L.P. (“PLC”), against the USPA and its licensee Arvind Ltd.
The lawsuit, which was filed by RLC in October 2013, is related to trademark
litigation that has been underway since 1984 between the USPA and RLC – and
the use of certain names, logos and trademarks in connection with the USPA’s
production and marketing of merchandise. In 2003, the USPA and RLC and its
subsidiaries executed a settlement agreement which defined the terms under
which the USPA has the right to market its products. In granting the USPA’s
motion to dismiss RLC’s lawsuit, the SDNY upheld the terms of the settlement
agreement – in which RLC conceded the legitimacy of the USPA’s Double Horseman
trademarks and agreed that any disputes concerning the use of those trademarks
should be resolved in arbitration.
W. David Cummings, President and Chief Executive Officer of USPA Properties,
Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of USPA and its licensing arm, said, “We are
extremely pleased with the Court’s ruling on multiple levels. It is yet
another judicial decision which validates the settlement agreement under which
the parties have co-existed for more than 10 years, and which recognizes Ralph
Lauren’s agreement that the USPA may use its Double Horsemen trademarks.”
Mr. Cummings continued, “We believe Ralph Lauren’s underlying claims are both
unnecessary and meritless. We have marketed our merchandise legally under our
pre-existing agreement with Ralph Lauren – and have strict policies and
procedures in place to ensure that our international licensees also abide both
those parameters. We are confident in our position should Ralph Lauren elect
to move forward with arbitration.”
Posted-In: News Legal Press Releases
