Sign up today for an exclusive discount along with our 30-day GUARANTEE — Love us or leave, with your money back! Click here to become a part of our growing community and learn how to stop gambling with your investments. We will teach you to BE THE HOUSE — Not the Gambler!

Click here to see some testimonials from our members!

Federal Bench Needs Judicial Nominees With Consumer Perspective

By Anna Peel. Originally published at ValueWalk.

Judicial Nominees Michael T. Flynn Arbury Murder Case

Federal Bench Needs Judicial Nominees With Consumer, Worker Perspective


Q1 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

The Need For Judicial Nominees With Greater Professional Diversity

A group of 24 organizations today called on President Biden to nominate jurists to the federal courts who reflect a commitment to professional diversity and to reach beyond the large legal firms that often furnish many judicial nominees.

“To serve economic and racial justice in general and financial reform in particular, we need judicial nominees with greater professional diversity, and especially more judicial nominees with direct experience representing consumers and workers and a deeper understanding of how the justice system works for everyday people,” said Linda Jun, senior policy counsel, Americans for Financial Reform. “Consumer attorneys, legal aid lawyers, public defenders and other lawyers with a track record of working in the public interests will bring invaluable perspectives to a judiciary whose decisions will have a profound impact on everyday people but is too often dominated by nominees from elite law firms.”

A copy of the letter can be found below.

Letter To President Biden

Dana Remus

Counsel to the President

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington D.C. 20500

Dear Ms. Remus,

The 24 undersigned consumer, civil rights, community, housing, and other public interest organizations applaud the White House for moving swiftly on judicial nominations and putting forth 11 accomplished and diverse candidates in your announcement last week. We appreciate your statements on nominating professionally and demographically diverse candidates to fill federal judicial vacancies, and strongly urge you to prioritize both professional and demographic diversity for all future judicial nominations.

Historically, the vast majority of judicial nominations from both parties have been overwhelmingly corporate attorneys and prosecutors. As a result, the federal courts are packed with corporate lawyers turned judges, which has a tangible impact on justice in this country. Many low-income consumers and workers face significant limitations in their pursuit of justice because almost all of the decision makers in the federal judiciary have no experience representing people like them. Lawyers who have spent their careers developing an in-depth understanding of the legal needs of everyday people are systematically underrepresented on the federal bench. It is critical that future nominees possess the necessary skills, experience, and perspective that can only be gained by representing the rights of consumers and workers. The only hope of restoring balance to the federal judiciary lies within the White House’s commitment to put forward a more representative slate of federal judicial nominees in the months and years to come.

While your first batch of judicial nominees took some important steps necessary to create a more diverse and balanced federal judiciary, we remain concerned that it did not include anyone with genuine experience representing consumers and workers, but instead continued the historic pattern of drawing nominees from big corporate law firms. We hope that future nominees will include people with this crucial experience, and look forward to supporting the administration in the goal of moving towards a fairer justice system.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please contact Linda Jun at linda@ourfinancialsecurity.org.

Sincerely,

Americans for Financial Reform

Center for Digital Democracy

Center for Justice and Democracy

Community Christian Legal Aid

Connecticut Fair Housing Center

Consumer Action

Empire Justice Center

Indiana Assets & Opportunity Network

Jacksonville Area Legal Aid

Law Zebra

Massachusetts Communities Action Network

Mobilization for Justice

Mountain State Justice, Inc.

National Association of Consumer Advocates

National Consumer Law Center (on behalf of its low income clients)

National Employment Lawyers Association

National Fair Housing Alliance

Prosperity Indiana

Public Good Law Center

Public Justice

Public Law Center

South Carolina Appleseed Legal Justice Center

Texas Watch

U.S. PIRG

The post Federal Bench Needs Judicial Nominees With Consumer Perspective appeared first on ValueWalk.

Sign up for ValueWalk’s free newsletter here.


Do you know someone who would benefit from this information? We can send your friend a strictly confidential, one-time email telling them about this information. Your privacy and your friend's privacy is your business... no spam! Click here and tell a friend!





You must be logged in to make a comment.
You can sign up for a membership or get a FREE Daily News membership or log in

Sign up today for an exclusive discount along with our 30-day GUARANTEE — Love us or leave, with your money back! Click here to become a part of our growing community and learn how to stop gambling with your investments. We will teach you to BE THE HOUSE — Not the Gambler!

Click here to see some testimonials from our members!