login | become a member

Archive for July 6th, 2008

A Noisy World

But what has this to do with the stock market?  As traders, we are receiving information each day that we must learn to process and indeed we must learn to filter some of it out.  This is an enormously challenging task because our natural inclination is to apply bias to the information we receive.  For example, if we are bullish on a stock and an analyst disseminates a report that aligns with our views, our opinions are more likely to strengthen.  In order to achieve our objective of trading without bias, we must recognize that history is laden with examples of the stock market confounding expectations.

In the 1970s, few envisioned that commodity prices would elevate to the degree they did or that bond yields would rise up to 15% by 1981 or that bond yields would decline to around 3% in 2003 or that a protracted equity bull market would ensue.  Few expected that almost two deacdes after the Japanese market reached its peak, it would still be down 60% from its highs.  Few recognized in 2000 that commodity prices were at historic lows while China and India were emerging rapidly.

Recognizing that the opinions you hear from others originate from a place of vested interest means critically analyzing comments becomes imperative.  For example, just a couple of months ago, Lehman’s CEO announced that "the worst is behind us".  It is evident from the chart below that the worst had certainly not been priced into the stock yet! 

 

Clearly a delineation between expressed views and market action took place in all previous examples.  The insurmountable challenge most traders encounter when confronted with such a delineation is their own attempt to justify the action.  Why did Lehman go down?  Why did bond yields surge?  Why did commodity prices soar?  Why has the Japanese market not recovered?  A lot of calories may be wasted in striving to justify market action.  The reason they are wasted is not because it is not a worthy process to understand the causes of market movements but because it often distracts from the primary objective - finding opportunities!  

By maintaining focus on the question "Why did this happen?", focus is lost from the question that should always be asked "What opportunities exist that I can take advantage of?"  Sticking with the former is equivalent to the first two stages in the grieving process: denial and anger!  It’s almost like exclaiming "I can’t believe this is happening to me….grrrrrr!!!".  With practice, it becomes ever easier to switch from the stages of denial and anger to the most important stage, acceptance.  Acceptance means following the current market action rather than reflecting on past market action.  By staying in the present, we can be unencumbered and unhindered by events of the past.  At times like these especially, this is of paramount importance.

 




 

Phil's Favorites

Scanning the News

Roger Ehrenberg's general thoughts on the market, courtesy of Roger at Information Arbitrage.

Scanning the News: Tough Times Require Decisive Action

Though I get most of my in-depth commentary on business and technology from blogs, I augment that with mainstream news headlines and alerts. I often extract the implied sentiment of headlines to get a tone of the

more from Ilene

Trading Goddess

Post Comments

(no, no... that is not me!
Add a couple decades, dye the hair brown,
have a couple children and voila!
That's is me!)...

more from Goddess

The Options Report

By Andrew Wilkinson and Rebecca Darst



JPMorgan decline sets off bullish option bets for 2009

Today’s tickers: JPM, BBY, ACE, IRM, SHLD & CSCO

JPM – JP Morgan Chase & Co. – With the market in meltdown mode, investors are once again departing all shades of financial shares. There are new lows today at several major financial institutions including blue-blooded JP Morgan. The 52-week $28.87 low is a radical shift from the $50.50 52-week peak set three days into October. We’re not sure many financial companies can claim to have traded annual peaks and lows in such a short space of time, but this underscores the negative outlook for the economy and companies regardless of shade. Options on JPM are in play today with large buying of this week’s expiring 30 strike puts at 1.40 premium. Today’s investor interest at that strike is equal to the outstanding number of puts at the strike and shows h

more from Andrew

Stock and Option Trades
(Advanced option strategies)

Fuzzy Math!

Have you ever seen literature from a fund posting attractive gains and comparing its performance to that of the benchmark S&P 500?  Have you ever investigated how the figures listed were calculated?  If not, you will definitely want to read on! Let's take a fairly representative example.  Fund Manager Joe Bull, for example, is very good at generating profits in bull markets.  Let's say Joe Bull made 20% in each of the years 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007.  But Joe Bull does not have the toolset to survive bear markets and finds in 2008 that he is down 30%.  What has Joe Bull's return been over 5 years? It turns out, the answer to that questions depends greatly on what Joe Bull wants to report as his return!  Why? Because little regulation exists to prevent Joe Bull from choosing any number of mathematical approaches to calculate his return! For example, fund manager Joe could simply take the average of his returns over 5 years.  This would be calculated as the sum of 2 more from Option Trades

Option Sage
(Strategy and Education)

Trivia Time!

Let's say you decide to deposit $100,000 into a brokerage account.  You decide you will check your portfolio on a weekly basis.  Now let's further assume that the first week has passed and you are about to log in to your account.  But before you do, you are told that one of two things has happened in the past week.

[1]  Your portfolio went up $10,000 and then dropped $10,000

[2]  Your portfolio went up 10% and then dropped 10%.

So, the trivia question is:  In case [1], what should you expect your account value to be and is that the same figure as in case [2]?

If you answered $100,000 in case [1], you would be absolutely correct!  If you answered that this is the same as in case [2] you would be absolutely incorrect!  Why?  Well let's take a look at what happens when the portfolio rises 10% first; it goes from $100,000 to $110,000.  But then we're told it drops 10%.  10% of $110,000 is $11,000 more from Option Sage


0.36 seconds, 28 queries.