Poor CNBC! They are never going to get those chocolates…
I joked with Members during yesterday's rally, after Fast Money's bullish "Half-Time Report": "Uh oh – All the Fast Money people said buy – make sure you have your disaster hedges in place!" Indeed the market fell off a cliff almost the second they said it but we got out of our TZA calls (a little early) and did a little bottom fishing yesterday with our own buys on LYG ($3.13), Short EUO ($25.30), VZ ($27), FRO ($30.50), RIG ($58.50) and PFE ($15.10). Maybe I'm just a paranoid conspiracy theorist but I said to Members at the close:
That was a sad little show at the end wasn’t it? Nas was beaten with a stick into the close. AAPL $243, BIDU $67.46, AMZN $123… Ugly stuff. Not at all sure what they were trying to accomplish if not a flush…
Gap/RMM – Yes (we will gap) up. I just didn’t see why we would sell off like that. It seems that someone wanted to paint un ugly picture, maybe they didn’t get a good fill on Tuesday morning? Maybe not gap up tomorrow, maybe another drop and THEN we take off but I’m thinking a fund that wants to make numbers on Friday would want to flush us today and buy the SPX overnight and pump us up for a big finish so they can get back to cash on Friday and book it.
Isn't it funny how that's pretty much exactly what's happening this morning? A huge gap up into the open that's erasing the previous day's losses when no one is trading – just like yesterday (when I get on my knees and pray – we won't get fooled again). Fast Money got fooled out of their bullish 1:50 positions by 5pm as suddenly they relized the market is controlled by evil computer programs – not exactly news to us and no reason to shake us out of our well-hedged positions. We ignored rumors on China (and we always ignore Steve Ballmer) in chat and those seemed to be the major rumors moving the market lower yesterday.
Cramer kept the rumor mill grinding, saying: "The Chinese reportedly are debating whether or not to sell their European bonds, and that’s what killed our upward momentum." CNBC seems to have pulled the video so it's hard to tell the tone but Cramer put up a list of a dozen stocks to buy but said to wait for a 5% correction and concluded: "The next time you’re looking for stocks to buy after we get hammered off the euro, after the banking crisis in Spain or potential country defaults,” Cramer said, “take a look” at these stocks."
It's too bad Cramer doesn't understand how to use options or people could buy those stocks for a 20% discount right now. For example, with FDO ($40.87) we could simply sell the dreaded NAKED PUT, like the July $38 put for $1.25 and that puts us in the stock at net $36.75, a 10% discount right there but, of course, that's just a simple way to play, you can do much better by buying FDO as Cramer suggests AND selling the 2012 $40 calls for $7.50 and the 2012 $32.50 puts for $4 and that puts you in the stock for net $29.37 and you will either get called away at $40, with a 36% gain or you will have another round put to you at $32.50 for an average entry of $30.94, a nice 24% discount off today's price. If you are a long-term investor, wouldn't it be nice to take all your initial entries at a 20% discount?
Speaking of discounts – Kudos to David Ristau from the Oxen Group for putting Members into PAY in yesterday's "Overnight Trade of the Day." David's analysis of PAY was like getting the earnings report in advance! Keep in mind we ALWAYS sell into the initial excitement on these but what a great one-day ride! "Long-Term Investment of the Week", BIG also had good earnings this morning and hopefully we get a nice pop there as well – who says we don't trade straight stocks at PSW???
After taking a day off the fundamentals yesterday (since they weren't going to matter in a panic-driven market), we now get a BIG one with the Q1 GDP, which is expected to be revised up from 3.2% to 3.4%. Another 450,000 people probably lost their jobs last week (yawn) and we have the KC (11 am) and Chicago (Noon) Manufacturing Reports just ahead of the 1pm attempt by our government to find $31Bn worth of suckers to buy 7-year notes in exchange for just 2.8%, about 1/3 of what it was 10 years ago.
A good portion of this money is still going to bailing out banks, who apparently return the favor by lying to investors. According to the WSJ: "Bank of America Corp. and Citigroup Inc. incorrectly hid from investors billions of dollars of their debt, similar to what Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. did to obscure its level of risk… In recent filings with regulators, the two big banks disclosed that over the past three years, they at times erroneously classified some short-term repurchase agreements, or "repos," as sales when they should have been classified as borrowings."
While the amounts concerned are "only" Billions (the two banks have over $4Tn on deposit), what I find disturbing is that, almost 2 full years into the banking crisis, STILL NO ONE IS AUDITING THEIR BOOKS?!? Come on Government, we are spending $1,500,000,000,000 more money than we take in – surely we can afford $100,000 for a guy to give the books a once-over! A bankruptcy-court examiner said Lehman had been doing the same thing to make its balance sheet look better before it filed for bankruptcy in September 2008, using a strategy dubbed "Repo 105" that helped the Wall Street firm move $50 billion in assets off its balance sheet.
Bank of America and Citigroup were among the banks cited in a page-one Wall Street Journal article on Wednesday detailing how financial firms temporarily shed repo debt at the ends of quarters, when they report their finances to investors. Since the financial crisis began, both banks often have reduced their quarter-end repo debt from their average borrowings for the same quarter. Repos are short-term loans that allow banks to take bigger risks on securities trades; classifying the transactions as sales instead of borrowings allows a firm to take assets off its balance sheet and thus reduces its reported leverage, or assets as a multiple of equity capital.
8:30 Update: It turns out BAC and C are not the only ones inflating their figures. Q1 GDP was, in fact, revised DOWN 0.2% to 3%, not the up 0.2% expected. As we had originally expected (before the GDP "proved" us wrong), consumer spending was the weak spot and our high-commodity trade deficit was another big drag on the economy. 3% GDP is not going to be putting anyone to work – After the last severe recession in the early 1980s, GDP grew at rates of 7 to 9 percent for five straight quarters and the unemployment rate dropped from 10.8 to 7.2 percent in 18 months. Housing and commercial real-estate are major weak spots for the economy. Builders cut spending in each by double digits in the first quarter. One bright spot – Corporate profits were revised UP, from 8.2% to 9.7%.
Of course we all know what this means…. MORE FREE MONEY!!! That's right, bad news is good news as slow news like this sends Benny and Timmy running right for the printing presses and I'm sure that Blanfein is on the phone to Obama now telling him he can "fix" this if Obama just gives him another $50Bn. Speaking of Blankfein – The tens of Millions of dollars the Banksters are spending to lobby Senators to ensure serious financial reform never sees the light of day are chump change considering what's at stake, Simon Johnson of the IMF says.
Not unexpectedly, China denies a report that it's reviewing its foreign exchange holdings of euro assets, calling the speculation groundless. "Europe has been, and will be one of the major markets for investing China's exchange reserves," said the State Administration of Foreign Exchange. The euro is not in danger, and a breakup of the eurozone is out of the question, former Bundesbank president Helmut Schlesinger says. The euro's (ETFs: FXE, EUO) 6-month, 20% plunge against the dollar is cause for concern, but its level "is by no means catastrophically low," he added.
Europe is trading up around 2% just ahead of the US open and Asia was right around our 1.25% rule so technical bounces all around so far, which is pretty good considering the rotten signal sent out by that very fake US close. Maybe all of our international PSW readers are helping their fellow countrymen wise up to the shenanigans being pulled in the US markets – that would be nice!
They are lining up in Japan to get their hands on IPads, due to be released today while AAPL (among others) investigates a rash of suicides at one of their Chinese manufacturing plants. Japanese exports continue to hum along at a pace that's 40% over last year's indicating that fears of a global slowdown are probably a tad overdone. At home, oil is back at $73 (go USO!) as Obama suspends Arctic drilling until 2011.
We already have our buys in so today is more about whether we re-hedge to the downside or not. We've gotten so many great entries below Dow 10,000 now, it's going to be hard to buy more over 10,200 but let's not get ahead of ourselves – we aren't there yet!
ss: there are obviously economic reasons why it breaks UP from R2 ? I believe the oil leak fixing helps as it looks it is a success.
Vix is falling, bots moving the tape towards the precious 1100…Go China!
to the board: Hi everybody, does anyone know who are the top cleaning outfits for the gulf mess? Thanks
$6.76.2, less than 1% on the day , damn !!
Phil: the DOW is up more than 244 points and what is your hunch for tomorrow ?
JRW – SS
Out at 6.70… 10 cent loss. Not sure of the out but it seems to be pushing higher and want to hold 10,200 and close to 1100 as possible.
Sean, I shorted BIDU today expecting a pullback at the close.
lionel’
How did you lose $ on TNA ?
judah – screen play. 6 points bulls.
JRW didn’t you enter at 6.79.9 and exit below that? You mean for the day as a whole your up? 2moro is another day!
UNG/Gel – Well we sold puts ages ago and I just posted a play above. Yes to all, I think UNG is a great play for a short-term (Oct) run and also a great long-term position and you can establish by just selling the Jan $7 puts for .95 for a $6.05 net entry (down 17%) so a simple enough way to play them or get greedy and combine it with an upside bull call spread. It all goes to hell if the global economy collapses, of course…
DIA Mattress/Yodi – Right now I like a 1/2 cover with the June $103 puts against the Sep $100 puts.
CREE/Arbo – Right strategy, wrong stock. They are crazy high valued right now and you are playing into a weak market. Part of the idea of these trades, which are fairly inflexible by nature, is that you want to trade stocks that you can’t imagine would drop 40% but, if they did, you’d be happy to DD. To me, CREE does not fit that bill and the crazy premium prices reflect that consesus risk. Also, selling 10 puts and calls against 500 shares is dangerous unless you REALLY don’t mind being assigned another 1,000 shares at $55 or and you are prepared to pay for 1,000 x everything over $70 in Jan 2012. At 5 contracts, your spread is good as you drop the net basis to $38.41/46.70 with a call away with a near double at $70 so fine and dandy if you are bullish on CREE and REALLY don’t mind owning 1,000 shares at $46.70.
Fine music for raising the Russell to 666. Sometimes I wonder if the bot boys do this for fun because 666 does come up way too often for coincidence – the NYSE just finished at 6,666 the other day…
EDZ/Tusca – If it’s not a hedge it should have been stopped out while up. It’s still good insurance but no point if you are not making money to the upside against it.
DeMark/RMM – It’s an interesting thing that seems to hold up but lack of standard indicators (that I have access to anyway) makes it uninteresting to me. I like following things I can flip to in 5 seconds, anything that detracts me from my reading I just find annoying for the most part.
Moving average/RMM – I flip from 1 to 3 to 5 to 10 but if a change in direction doesn’t give me at least a full candle on a 10-min chart I’m pretty much going to ignore it.
JRW/
Sorry just a typo, I meant TZA. I would have asked the same question 🙂
Chaps/Trading
I agree with you… fundamentals usually prevail when all the chips are in. Trading is much like flying an airplane – the best pilots are those that have the "feel" in their butt. When everything hits the fan, it is too late to read the book!
yip,
Yes, for the day I’m up less than 1%; too much work, not enough fun. I should have quit after ss gave me $7K and played golf !!
Phil: what drives this market now that high the last 30 min ?
A stick after already up over 2.5% just seems silly.
AAPL over its 20 sma resistance.
…buyers based on closing above 10,200… for the next 5% up
JRW – HAH I hear that!!! I lost 1,5% on a relatively small position, no biggie just happy to see it’s another 10 cents lower and not higher!!! BUT most importantly I see the strategy much more clearly… C U 2moro… I doubt your numbers will change much but I’ll do my own investigating and we’ll see 2moro.
ss
4.35% on the Russell; just nuts !!
ss
agree, it was up so much, all those lines did not predict this and R2 did not act as resistance, there are other factors which did this,
its also end of month and a holiday coming, oil well maybe ok, so lets be euphoric.
JRW – yep. Last 6 days never happened. Being agnostic is one thing, but I hate to see them just ruin this market. How can you trust any of it. If someone sneezes at the wrong time we will just go right back down. Silly, silly, silly.
Two of the accounts I manage have very different positions but finished with gains within $1 of each other. $4554 v. $4555. I think that’s another satanic omen — call in Celine!
666 does come up way too often for coincidence
Now we’re moving from TA to numerology….lol
BIDU should die because a lot of us are short the June calls…..
It already seemed to die, then came back to life today.
ss: my rules did not work the last 1 hour, after market was so fgar up, and R2 was reached I bought TZA and guess its a loser. Very annoying.
Just watched CNBC, they say its the financials and oil which drove the market up.
SSO/Never – D’oh! I keep mixing those up. ATTN – Earlier I mentioned SSO spread (now deleted to avoid confusion) as a bear hedge and meant to do SDS as below:
Meanwhile, I’ll take full credit for the SSO spread, which is up nicely on that super-stick into the close. 😎
Tracking/Hulk – Hard to say as they are so far out and fairly new still. As long as you stick with hedged positions, they are not so bad but buying naked calls on the ultras, especially the 3x ones, is very dangerous as they can lose a lot of ground in a volatile market. Keep in mind the key word "DISASTER" and if the market really starts to melt down, the math that takes over driving a bearish ultra higher on consecutive down days is severe. Even the $7 TZA if hit with down days of 5%, 2.5%, 1.5%, .5% and .25% conscecutively would gain 15%, 7.5%, 4.5%, 1.5% and .75% to end up at $9.25 (up 32%) on 10% drop in the index. Of course, similarly, they get ripped to shreds on consecutive up days too.
SSO/Pyern – Yeah, you guys need to watch me on that one!
Hunch/RMM – I still say we are owed a pullback. The Dow is up 400 points from last night’s low so I expect a retest of 10,150 before they head higher. Maybe 1,095 on S&P and 650 on RUT. As to what drives the market – clearly a stick save – there was no news, nothing. They are painting a pretty picture so China and Europe can be happy going into their weekend.
Silly it is SS!
Chaps…..I was reading a book one night in bed when my wife asked "What are you reading?" to which I replied, " A History of Mathematics, by Victor Katz." She said, "You’ve got to be kidding." She labelled me a nerd on that evening and I can’t get it rescinded. 🙂
Speaking of TA, it looks like we’re well on our way to making some right shoulders on all the indices.
Obama Cites Economy as Crucial to Security Strategy (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news)
May 27 (Bloomberg) — President Barack Obama stressed the need to “renew our economy” while strengthening diplomatic alliances and maintaining military power to keep the country safe in issuing his first national security doctrine.
As the U.S. emerges from the worst recession since the 1930s, steps are being taken to ensure that “our recovery is broad and sustained,” according to the strategy.
CNBC’s sure changed their tune. Cheerleaders in full RAH ! now.
Iflan:
There are actually some really interesting stories in math history. Fermat writing down his "last theorem" just before dying. A very simple proposition about numbers that Fermat claimed he could prove. It drove people nuts for centuries and was not proved until the last 10 years – requiring a huge arsenal of modern mathematics.
Galois – who hung out with harlots and wrote down a lot of his important stuff the night before dying in a duel.
Thanks JRW!
Your posts today provided some great advice on short term trading. I have a clearer picture now what indicators to look for. It might not have been such a successful day moneywise but you sure helped some of your fellow PSW members today. That’s a another way to look at the day.
Kink – You got that right… 2-3 month summer rally back to highs… then KABOOM biggest fastest collapse ever. This is what is going to happen IMHO. If we get back to 11200-11800 I’m going to be going ALL IN for the downside
JRW… I will second todayokay’s post I honestly appreciate all your guidance. If I can return the favor let me know! A golf round I can provide however you would need to be in Southern Cal!
todayokay,
Thanks, I’ll try to keep that in mind; but in the future I’d like everyone to make a healthy profit as well !!
yip,
Not a problem, I’m on the Sonoma coast, but my in-laws are in Beverly Hills and we visit often.
Does anybody have any experience with Lightspeed as their broker?
yip,
And BTW, the next time you see me ignore my own system, remind me of what happened today, thanks.
Speaking of mathematics, I think I’ve noticed a relationship between the DOW, VIX, and the number of posts on this site on a daily basis. Number of posts rises with volatility and with DOW fluctuations. Post numbers fall when the market calms. I’ll let you know when I’ve figured out the exact formula.
@lflantheman
very interesting observation – now, chart the daily post numbers against the VIX, calculate the running averages (5 and 50 day windows should suffice) – then against those plot JRW’s daily golf score……..could be very revealing.
Chaps, Its nice to see another mathematician out there (I cant think of another reason you would know about those 2 stories).
Phil, what do you think about the following trade, a double calendar on BP for $4.97.
+1 JAN11 49 CALL
+1 JAN11 40 PUT
-1 JUN 49 CALL
-1 JUN 40 PUT
The idea is to take advantage the difference in implied VOL. The front month is at 54%, JUL is at 50%, the LEAPS are at 40%. Ideally you should be able to let the front months expire every time and keep selling. Looking at the P/L graph this trade is profitable from at least $38-$51.5 every month.
My other feeling is that BP doesn’t go bankrupt for at least 6 months
iflan – i hope you’re not letting us in on this b/c you must defend your honor tomorrow.
JR ‘dub’
Let me know when your headed down I’m in Brentwood. I might be able to get us off at LACC or Sherwood.
Hey next time i see you ‘going against your own system’……I’ll just type…SI! (Stop It!)
Phi- I own INSP small, how should I play it with options. (they have good growth) Thank you.
Sorry…Phil
Phil:
Am new member, but following your non member posts for a couple months with paper trades.
90% in cash since May1, had 20% return from January so far this year.(dealing with a $2.5M portfolio)
What is wrong with: buy 10 AAPL july 130 c for $103.50, sell the July 260 c’ for $10.65 and a stop at 230 after acquired? I want to own the stock and got out of it around $255-258 few weeks ago
Thanks
Head and shoulders (knees and toes)/Kinki – I think it very much depends on your chart time-frame. You could look at the spike-down and recovery in early may and the failure in late May as completing the H&S pattern – just in a very compressed time-frame (which can happen when computers are doing the trading). I’ll be talking about this this morning but notice the pattern on the two-month chart as well as how rapidly we’re re-taking those declining 20 dmas that I drew out earlier in the week. Of course it’s fake and ridiculous but – what can you do?
Obama/Gold – Yes, having an economy is a good thing! It’s especially helpful to security when you have a $1,100,000,000,000 annual military jones to feed…
CNBC/Ekor – Hard to keep track at this point.
All in/Yip – I don’t know about being all anything in this crazy market but we can design upside disaster hedges as well when we get back to bearish. Actually, I’m still not sure I’m bullish after yesterday’s nonsense proved that these markets are still a fantasy trading session and nothing more.
PSW Theorem/Iflan – That makes sense because volatlility breeds questions on adjustments.
BP/Craig – It’s fine in theory. I also don’t see BP going BK in short order and the drag of lawsuits and the clean-up effort – even if they shut the well tomorrow – will drag on for quite some time and should keep them range-bound. I think your real danger is to the upside as the actual shut-down of the leak will quickly draw in the arb crowd, who will likely discount the estimated cost of clean-up over 3 years, which will likely have them arriving at a $56 target (assuming a $10Bn cost) or maybe $52 if they factor in new regs but, like I said earlier, if oil is back over $80 then BP has big upside along with our beloved XOM.
INSP/Gulf – I think the multiples are rich given the declining growth potential. They just spent $8M for Mecantilla’s ECommerce platform but that tanked the stock because a lot of investors realize that the margins there are going to bring down the average – even if it does succeed. So I would have a cautious attitude and sell the Jan $7.50 puts and calls for $2.60, which drops the current $8.34 price down to net $5.74/6.62, which is a fine 30% upside if called away in Jan and a nice 20% discount if put to you in Jan but you have to REALLY want to own 2x at $6.62, which is not a terrible play as you can sell, for example, July $10s for .10 and if you sell .60 worth of calls a year that’s about a 10% return for a long-term hold.
Welcome Maya! Interesting you should start off with "What is wrong with" as it’s not a bad, conservative trade. Mainly my issue is with tying up $103.50 on the July $130 call. Your premise is AAPL goes over $260 but you cap your gains at $260 in the vertical so your max payout is $130. Oh wait, that would be good but that can’t be right… It’s not possible for you to buy the July $130 call for $103.50 with AAPL at $253. I see the $130 call at about $123. $103.50 was the last sale price but just because that was the last sale, does not mean you’ll get it for that (sorry).
So let’s look at how we can get bullish on AAPL (and I’m not very bullish on AAPL here). Last time we played AAPL I favored the ratio backspread, which went great as we were able to take out the front-month caller and now we can reload as they bounce back up. The Oct $290 calls are $10 and our goal would be selling the June $270 calls for $6 on a $10 move up in AAPL but, if AAPL fails $250, then we sell the $260 calls for $5 (now $6) and we plan to use that $5 to roll the Oct $290s down to the Oct $270s. This is how you can work your way into a nice spread. Rather than laying out $100 for 10 contacts ($100K) and spinning the wheel on the July finish, you can spend $10 on 20 contracts ($20,000) and sell $20 $5 contracts, one way or the other ($10,000) and you have $90,000 on the sidelines ($40-60K used in margin on the initial spread) to adjust your position. Oct is 5 months away and if you can roll your longs down $20 per month through the sale of front-month calls, you’ll be in the Oct $170s for $10. That’s not likely to happen but that’s the goal and we don’t need to get all the way to that goal to have a very nice AAPL position. Given your account side, this is a very good live trade you can play with and I would be more than happy to follow up with adjustments along the way as this is a strategy many members can benefit from.
Phil- Thanks, 6.50 would work thats their net cash position, thanks for the help
Hey Phil,
As a fairly new member I’ve done a couple of your buy/writes with success (Thanks!). I’m not comfortable yet with the shorter term plays, and they require more time during the day to manage than I can usually alot. I’ve seen you make reference in Chat to exercising the Put sell leg of a buy/write as a mellow way to enter. I, like some other may find themselves, am in a situation looking for a relatively safe way to replace lost income on a monthly basis. I usually use Put selling on a shorter term basis (1-3 mo) rather than the longer intervals of the buy/writes. Do you recommend using the buy/write Puts in this fashion, or would you recommend a different strategy?