Why 11,420 on the Nasdaq 100?
That’s the 200 WEEK moving average – a very significant technical line and we’ve already failed our Strong Bounce Line at 12,000 and, below this, support is way down at 10,000 – a 20% drop from here.
Today is Pearl Harbor Day – a day that may live in infamy for more than one reason if the Nasdaq fails to hold again. It has failed before in the past few months but now we’re past earnings and there’s not much to save it if it takes another dive.
We reviewed our Short-Term Portfolio (STP) hedges on what I called: “Mixed Signal Monday” in expectations of weakness and we’ve already cut half the long positions from our Long-Term Portfolio (LTP) in our last review, way back on November 15th, also in anticipation of a sell-off so we almost hope it will happen – though not for the sake of the average investor – who is ill-prepared for these events.
We had more fun playing with Natural Gas (/NG) Futures yesterday but, as I told the Members on the first run to $5.60 – you have to take those gains off the table quickly or they tend to evaporate (this does not affect the UNG spread).
$5.50 is our bullish line and we play it when /NG is crossing OVER from below – so it has momentum heading up. As you can see, that worked for our morning call to the tune of $1,000 per contract, then failed on the next cross for a $500 loss, then a $500 gain on the next cross and then, overnight, another cross for big money at $1,000 and now $2,000 for those who held on (we prefer to take 1/2 off quickly and stop the rest out if $5.50 fails).
The Dollar tested 106 overnight but came back down when China finally announced some actual easing of their Covid policies. That then strengthened the Yuan and pushed the Dollar back down but that’s why I’m now VERY CONCERNED that it isn’t cheering up our indexes – as that’s two strong positives. The Hang Seng actually fell 2.5% as now investors are worried about soaring infection rates as the Chinese are allowed to go out and about. You can’t win…
- The Covid Policy Changes do not dismantle the policy, but they represent a loosening of measures that have dragged down the economy by disrupting daily life for hundreds of millions of people, forcing many small businesses to close and sending youth unemployment to a record high.
- Mass testing will no longer be conducted in areas that are not considered “high risk,” a designation for regions that have positive cases. The high-risk category is now limited to buildings, units, floors or households, rather than encompassing neighborhoods.
- Those who are infected with mild symptoms are now free to isolate at home. Close contacts are also allowed to quarantine at home, and will be released with a negative test on the fifth day.
- The measures circumscribe the power of local officials to impose lockdowns and ensure they are lifted quickly. Local authorities may still lock down buildings in the event that a positive case is detected, but they cannot restrict movement and suspend business operations in regions outside a specified “high risk” designation. For “high-risk” areas, the guidelines mandate lockdowns to be lifted if no new positive cases are detected for five consecutive days.
- The government reiterated its pledge to do more to increase the vaccination rate of older people. But the new rules left unanswered questions about how officials will try to contain the inevitable wave of infections.
So, as you can see, this is not going to “Fix” China’s economy – there are still major restrictions and it’s inevitable that there will be some massive outbreaks – especially as China’s non-MRNA vaccines are nowhere near as effective as the ones used in US and Europe.
China’s economy is still a catastrophe waiting to happen with property companies unable to repay Trillions in debt and housing speculators (EVERYONE!) are in BIG TROUBLE and the Chinese Government itself has gone from Zero debt in the 2008 crisis to $3.65Tn in debt as of last year – probably about $4Tn now.
That’s nothing compared to the US’s $32Tn, of course but China has this funny idea that debt is real and they should be concerned about it, which means they are less likely to be in the mood to hand Trillions to their Banksters – like the US likes to do whenever there’s a chill in the air.
Some good news this morning as Productivity finally stopped falling – up 0.8% for Q3 vs 0.6% expected and -4.1% in Q2. Of course that means we’re still down 3.3% from Q1 – so let’s not spend too much money on Champagne. Unit Labor Costs are still far ahead of Productivity Improvements, which is still bad for the S&P 500 – they were up 10.2% in Q2 – so at least they are calming down but this is not the chart of a healthy economy by any stretch:
Be careful out there!
Good morning. Here is the link to today’s webinar.
https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/3005601224060461152
Good morning!
I don’t want to come across as super-gloomy – we still have 45 long positions in the LTP but that’s down from 80 and we have 80% CASH!!! so we’d happy to see a pullback but also happy if we make another Million on a 20% pop in the markets.
Every single position that’s left is one we’ll be happy to DD on if the market drops 20% and that’s the way you need to feel about all your portfolio positions – that’s why we cut almost all the short puts – because we want to be able to add to our long positions, not scramble to cover new ones.
Good Morning.
EIA inventory report
UCO +0.45%
Dec. 07, 2022 10:31 AM ET
1 Comment
feels like oil is heading below $70
Well-deserved too. If not for Saudis holding back and Russian sanctions – we’d all be drowning in oil.
They simply refuse to do the math and it’s not just cars but cars alone are killing the oil trade.
Global Plug-In Electric Car Sales – August 2022
So what does that mean? That means 10M cars that used to get 30Mpg driving 15,000 miles a year used 500 gallons each (12 barrels) and now they use none so that’s 120M less barrels of oil (2Mb/week) of demand JUST from electric cars cutting back.
Additionally, 80M cars were sold globally and let’s say they got 30Mpg (960Mb) and now they get 45Mpg (8 barrels) so that’s 640Mb – 320Mb less or about 1Mb/d less consumption.
Obviously, Airlines, Trucking Companies and Manufacturers are also doing whatever they can to cut back on energy costs and every 1% they save knocks another 1Mb/d off Global consumption so let’s say they’ve cut back by 10% – that’s a complete disaster for the oil industry and they are not going to go back because there are now viable alternatives and OPEC’s little spiking game only incentified all those Industrial Consumers to spend money to PERMANENTLY get away from fossil fuels.
OPEC simply did the wrong thing at the wrong time because we’re just at that tipping point now where there are viable alternatives to oil at $80/barrel. Had they kept prices around $60 – there would have been no incentives to pursue those alternatives (other than caring about the imminent destruction of the planet) and consumption would not be falling off so drastically but now there are 3, 5 and 10-year projects in motion to cut consumption a solid 30-40% and the oil producers are well and truly screwed.
I noticed T is just about creeping up every day. should have bought even more in earlier days!!!!
Yes, I blame myself for not mentioning it enough… 🤓
T was net $27,550 when we did the Sept Portfolio Review and I said for the LTP:
The 2025 $15 ($4.88)/20 ($2.12) bull call spread is now $2.76 for a nice $18,200 gain and we’ll be thrilled to get $4 back on the original 200 20244 $20s but also thrilled to get $100,000 out of the new spread if we get over $20 and stay there.
The short puts are 2024 $25s and I was not inclined to roll them (in Oct or Nov either) since I still believe in that target for 2024.
same thoughts
MO hanging in there while PM is up over 100 again!!!
PM getting way more respect than MO (and they didn’t make that huge misstep with Juul).
JUUL settled 5000 law suits today. I think MO has room to run to $50+ now
for a new trade you can buy the stock for the dividend and sell the 2025 $47.50 or $50 calls and the $37.50 puts for a nice return
We already have a lot of MO – one of the ones we stuck with (no covers).
And where does the Nasdaq bounce?
TA guys are always asking me what I use to determine the pivots but, when I don’t name one of the ones they’ve heard of, they lose interest – especially when I try to explain the 5% Rule isn’t TA at all – it’s just math.
So now the math is the fall from 13,500 to 11,400 is 2,100 points so we get 400-point bounces (roundings) to 11,800 (weak) and 12,400 (strong) but not getting over 12,000 is what got us into this mess – so I would not count on that at al. Even 11,800 seems a bit of a stretch at the moment without a catalyst.
AAPL $180 to $140 is $40 (22%) but let’s say $140 is the base-line and $180 was on overshoot of the 20% move to $168 and we would check that by saying that $126 (weak retrace) should be support and $112 below that.
So AAPL is pretty much obeying the 5% Rule around the $140 line and playing stronger than the rest of the Nas (which are 80% of the index). RSI and MACD do not indicate that AAPL is particularly oversold here and they weren’t in our TotY finals because $2.3Tn is still 22.5x ($100-105Bn) and AAPL is usually lucky to get to 15x which would be a 33% contraction in AAPL and could easily be part of a 20% or more correction on the Nas.
In other words, don’t look for AAPL to save us and, at the moment, we have the short-term $15 drop so $3 bounces to $143 and $146 will let us know if any recovery is serious down here while anything below $140 is likely to break 11,420 and then – DOOM!!!!
I put in my toe to set up a play on AMZN Vertical 80/110 Jan 25 and sell 1/2 Jan 25 80 puts
Yodi,
thanks for sharing. What prices did you get ?
Maybe there’s a way you can start sharing your armchair portfolio again.
I still hold a good amount of old established armchairs. Stocks go up and down but good once are hard to find now and these days. So keep on looking
AMZN vertical cost 12.80 and the put sold for 12.40
That’s true and our Watch List for 2023 is going to be all the stocks we purged from the LTP and our TotY finalists. It’s not like better stocks will suddenly appear out of thin air – we know which ones are the best value already (for the most part).
Phil,
if you haven’t decided on an agenda for today’s Webinar, I would be interested to hear/see your process to determine:
1) What a good company is, especially companies you say you “love”.
2) How you determine what fair value is.
3) How you determine at what price you would initiate a trade.
I know you have done this before but I always learn something new when you do it.
Suggestions for companies you could to review are: AMZN, BAC, WDC, QCOM, CSCO, RTX, VZ.
I just want to see your process, especially what makes you NOT to like a company.
Other people might call out other companies to review too.
Just a suggestion
Thanks
It is stuff we’ve done before in other Webinars (check our YouTube Channel). In fact, it’s been a major topic for the past few weeks as we got to our Trade of the Year.
What has been our criteria for choosing top stocks in the past 3 months? I just went over them on Bloomberg last week….
Fair value is the price at which I’d like to buy the whole company. Fair isn’t really the word as I’m sure the majority shareholders would not call it fair but I like to buy unfair bargains – not middle of the cycle stocks.
So I initiate a trade when the stock is a low as I think it will get and, if it goes lower – I’m usually excited to buy more since the people selling it are the ones who are making a mistake – not me. As you can see from our DD on T in September. Yes it went lower – but those people were idiots.
Phil,
I did not mean to dismiss your reviews you have done in the past. With all the portfolios it’s been a big job. I’m still reviewing all of it.
Yes, it’s a huge job, which is why I don’t like to do it twice. 😉
Phil/Love
your thoughts on earnings? And any adjustments?
thanks
They actually beat though it was -0.55 vs -0.72 expected so not much of a victory. Sales were a small beat (+15%) as well with 8.9% growth in same-store sales and 18.5% growth in showrooms (more showrooms) and 6.3% more Web sales. Margins were 47.2% vs 44.5% expected. Nothing I’d throw out.
“We believe we are well positioned for the all-important fourth quarter holiday-season where early signs point to strong cash flow generation for the quarter,” CEO Shawn Nelson said. “At the same time, we are planning for continued inflationary pressure on consumers and intend to maintain tight expense management and careful prioritization of critical spending to support continued growth.”
Inventory issues appeared to catch the market’s attention, as inventory levels rose to $154.5M from $94.5M in the prior year quarter, representing an over 60% increase. Management also noted elevated freight costs related to the soaring inventory. Guidance on the impact of expected promotions was not provided.
In other words, they are well-stocked and ready for Christmas and they spent money and built inventory ahead of the holidays, rather than telling people who come to the showrooms it will take 3-4 months to get what they ordered.
The CEO shares his concerns and people freak out so it’s a good time to get in if you aren’t already.
We killed one of our LOVE positions in the Earnings Portfolio and we still have a complicated Dec $20/30 spread with short Jan $35 puts (worthless) and short Jan $25 puts we’ll have to roll. Will we adjust it? Sure, but not today.
In the Future is Now Portfolio, we have 20 Dec $20/30 spreads and we sold 5 Jan $25 puts and 10 Dec $17.50 puts so more rolling there and also no hurry to make changes.
We’ll see what happens into expiration week and then we’ll decide but I’m going to spend money to stick with them.
This is a good example of a company I would buy for $20 ($325M) that makes $40M on 15% expanding sales with $17M still in the bank net of debt, which is fabulous for a retailer. Oddly enough, they are being punished for successfully working the supply chain to be ready for the most important quarter of the year but that’s why we can make so much money trading – other investors are idiots!
LOVE is in the toilet this morning!!!
Time to Buy!
Let the dust settle but yes, nice time to add more.
I doubled my position around 18 and am loving it today. Already up around 7%.
i agree with analysis on oil consumption. However we need to also look into india which is now most populated country in the world and it is growing at 8% and also some of the african countries. i am from india and i can see how fast it is growing. so oil might fall but it may not fall as much. i think 60–70 dollar. just my thought.
Yes, if not for demand growth from population/industrialization oil would be a total catastrophe but not too many new ventures are planning their next decade using fossil fuels.
phil, are you going to buy nat gas here again?
Of course, $5.50 is our line – we buy when it crosses over and then sell 1/2 on a loss of momentum and put a stop back at $5.50 on the rest. Not complicated…
Phil, Which month’s future do you use for trading NG? Is it the front month or do you trade a couple of months out?
I just trade the front month because, when I don’t, I am always looking at the wrong chart and it pisses me off. Generally don’t hold them more than a few days anyway.
Phil also wondering what you think of natural gas companies. i used to own antero resources. they produce oil and natural gas liquids. they have significantly deleveraged and benefitted from high natural gas prices which were unhedged. if you were to play with them on options, how would you do it. thanks in advance
Remind me after the Webinar and I’ll take a look
As with EOG above, I would rather have an /NG pure play than mess around with Oil. KMI, LNG, EQT (Best choice, I think), SHEL, DCP, CTRA (2nd), RRC and, of course, our ET are the best ways to play /NG and I LOVE ET.
https://charts2.finviz.com/chart.ashx?t=eqt%20\&p=w&s=y
https://charts2.finviz.com/chart.ashx?t=ctra%20\&p=w&s=y
also maybe EOG resources
kakaluck / EOG my option screener shows there was a massive trade on 11/30
6500 April $115 puts were sold and 6500 April $160/ $180 call spreads bought. Its hard to see that being profitable but its a big trade just the same.
EOG as no debt and they make money at 40$ oil. they are exposed to natural gas. i follow a lot of oil analysis guys. they are saying that because of ESG regulations, the credit available for oil exploration is being reduced. we need CAPEX to sustain oil production. baring a deep recession , oil should be sustained at high levels. also if Fed pivots, then commodities will spike as the dollar falls. i was long EOG in the past but i closed them much too soon. i want to just have my portfolio with some exposure to oil. currently i dont have any. hence i am looking to add if we have a nice fall
EOG at $75Bn at $127 but they were $85 pre-war – so keep that in mind. In 2019 they made $2.7Bn on $17Bn in sales, 2020 they lost $600M on $11Bn in sales (not bad) and now they are making $8.5Bn on $26Bn in sales.
Nat gas was $2 back then and it’s not going back to $2 and likely $4 will hold so let’s say $22Bn is probably safe and that should be a solid $5-6Bn in profits. That’s only 15x and no debt and the cash flow to expand means they are very attractive – even at this price but I’d wait for a pullback on /NG closer to $4 and people will irrationally panic out of EOG and maybe the entry will be $80-100, which is a slam dunk.
If we don’t get there by March, then capitulate if you must. You can sell 2025 $80 puts for $8 if you are worried about missing out as that’s essentially free money unless /NG goes back to $2. At the moment, the 2025 $90 ($50)/120 ($35) bull call spread is $15 so those with the short puts would be net $7 but, as I said, I’d just do the puts and see what happens. The net Delta on the spread is 0.76/0.63 so 0.13 means a $10 pop in EOG will only cost you $1.30 more for the spread (and EOG would be at $136 so you’d be 110% in the money) while a $10 drop in EOG to $115 would let you buy the $80/110 spread for the same price – so no pressure to jump in now.
Oops, actually EOG is 70% oil and only 30% /NG and I don’t have faith in oil staying up so I’d just wait overall for better prices.
I still like ET, a finalist in out ToY. They make money no matter what the price of oil / gas is . ( K-! for the dividend, if you dont mind that )
Yes ET is absolutely the best in that space.
thank you very much phil
MSFT made a deal to bring Call of Duty ( ATVI ) to Nintendo for 10 years. I think that was one of the anti-trust issues with the MSFT / ATVI deal. I feel pretty confident the takeover will happen now. There is still some nice premium to be had in ATVI options.
Yeah, that’s pricing in more risk of deal failure than is likely.
Nice flat day for the indexes.
Consumer Credit went nowhere but nowhere is still very high.
“You load 16 tons, what do you get?
Another day older and deeper in debt
St. Peter, don’t you call me ’cause I can’t go