Let the rumors fly!
The FOMC meeting begins today but the actual rate decision comes tomorrow at 2pm. Between now and then the market will react to any supposed leaks that come out of the meeting.
As you can see from the WSJ Chart, we are in the steepest tightening cycle the Fed has ever gone through and it’s also the most in total but, to be fair, 0.25% was an artificial fantasy of economic stimulus – this is like being surprised that ice melts when you take it out of the freezer – it is simply not the natural state of water.
The natural state of interest rates are more like 3.5% and, at the moment, we are only 1.25% over that. It just feels like a lot because we’ve been below 1% for so long we’ve gotten used to it. Our main concern about Q1 Earnings was that companies might not handle the adjustment well and would let their debts eat into their earnings but that has not, so far, been the case for most companies.
As you can see from the long-term chart, the Fed did raise rates back to 5% pre-Covid and we did not act like the World was ending then (even though it was about to) and they are simply going back to 5% now but 5% is where they got to BEFORE we popped the money supply by 300% and caused MASSIVE INFLATION – the kind we had to raise rates to almost 20% to calm it down in the late 70s/early 80s. This is NOTHING!
The Fed began raising rates from near Zero in March 2022 as inflation was topping 8% for the first time since the 1980s. Another quarter-point increase would lift the benchmark Fed Funds Rate to a 16-year high. Fed officials are aware that their communications around future policy actions can be as significant as individual rate changes. They will finesse carefully calibrated signals in their post-meeting statement and remarks by Fed Chair Jerome Powell at a news conference after the meeting ends on Wednesday.
Generally, Powell has been good for a market pop the day of his press conferences but things tend to fall apart after that – so we probably won’t start buying for our new portfolios until next week.
What the Fed will be looking carefully at is Jobs. We have too many of them at the moment by about 9.5M (which will be confirmed in Fridays Non-Farm Payroll Report). That’s 5.6% more jobs than we have workers and that’s a huge problem – one I’m sure you see the effects of whenever you are waiting for food to be cooked or for someone to help you at the store but it’s also keeping your washing machine from being delivered and it’s taking longer to build your new car or new home and it’s the main force driving inflation:
So the Fed has a mandate to maximize employment and to control inflation. Employment has overshot their goal by 5.6% and Inflation is still more than double their goal of 2% and it’s really not possible to increase the workforce without Immigration (we need 9.5M people) or maybe just having lots more babies (abortion already banned) who will join the work-force in 20 years or (GASP!) pay wages that encourage more people to enter the workforce.
Since none of those things are going to happen (other than the baby-growing idea, which takes 20 years although, combined with dismantling child-labor laws, the GOP may be onto something…), the best way the Fed can close that worker gap is to reduce the number of jobs required and, fortunately, destroying the economy is easy – you just have to keep raising rates until demand collapses!
Yes, that is their actual plan at the moment and I don’t see why they would be “done” raising rates with 9.5M jobs still unfilled and core inflation still over 4% – those are both fails for their dual mandates!
The market is not likely to be very happy if the Fed does not get a pause but, as I just said, the Fed wants an unhappy market that will pare away 9.5M job openings and the only thing they can really control is how high they set the Fed Funds Rate. None of this is going to do anything about the $3Tn they have floating around in the money supply – that will also put upwards pressure on inflation for years to come but, fortunately, most of that money ($4.5Tn – other counties gave them money too!) went to people who are already rich so, as long as they continue horde it – we’ll be OK.
According to recent figures by the European Union’s statistics agency, Eurostat, Consumer Prices in the Eurozone were 7% higher than a year earlier in April, a pickup from March and more than three times the European Central Bank’s 2% target. However, the core rate of inflation – which excludes food and energy prices – edged down to 5.6% in April from a record high of 5.7% in March.
Some economists have noted that businesses are taking advantage of the situation and padding their profits, which is fueling inflation. Rising Wages were actually a lesser factor than rising profits and businesses are confident that Consumers will accept higher prices. This is largely happening because Consumers are aware of supply bottlenecks and higher energy prices.
Economists also suggest that the lack of competition in the food sector, especially in distribution, is another reason for the surge in food prices. It appears that businesses, in some cases, are using our national crisis as an opportunity to boost their profit margins.
While it’s nice that our Corporate Masters (who are also in the Top 0.1%) are doing what they can to take all that nasty money out of circulation – there is the eventual question of “Can we afford it?” and, if they don’t take that into account – the customers eventually run out of money and their “improved margins” can be very short-lived as we fall into a Recession.
Those are the kinds of data cross-winds we will be paying attention to because it’s not just about WHAT the Fed does – but whether what they do ultimately makes sense for our Economy going forward.
Good Morning.
Good morning. Happy Tuesday
Good morning!
Nice little dip to start us off and oil has collapsed back to $73.81.
They can’t get the demand data to match up with all the BS they keep spinning.
Dollar isn’t helping anyone today.
Rejected at 4,200 again.
Russell is just sad below 1,800…
And let’s put DAX 16,000 in perspective:
So the DAX did a full recovery to the highs while 4,800 to 3,500 is 1,300-points so 250-point bounces to 3,750 (weak), 4,000 (strong) and 4,250 would be the middle and we’re still waiting to get there.
Big lumber crash on low housing starts.
Factory Orders and JOLTs at 10.
I like this image Bing did for me:
You can see how fast deep fakes will take over the web. I could have said “at the Apple factory” or showed them making a certain product. I could have depicted the little boy being injured or have a mean-looking foreman standing behind them with a whip…
The entire concept of “photographic evidence” is out the window and then it will be video, audio…
We are getting into very strange territory here.
And then I publish it and Google crawls it and next thing you know, you have no idea if images in GOOGL are real. This is all happening very fast. Bing has a watermark in the bottom left (and the girl’s ear and fingers are a giveaway) but that can all be fixed in photoshop by someone who wants to fool people.
Elon Musk is using deep fakes as an excuse with the SEC to say he didn’t say the things they heard he said. It’s total BS but how will the prove it wasn’t?
Here’s a new thing you should remind Warren to do:
That was from yesterday afternoon – Gary is erratic in posting the data but he does it at the end of each trading day.
March Factory Orders were light, at 0.9% vs 1.1% expected (-1.1% in Feb) but that’s not a big deal so I guess it was JOLTS at 9.59M – which is just what I said it would be but I guess people were hoping for lower.
Essentially, it’s just what I said in the post – the Fed can’t possibly stop tightening if we’re still short 9.5M jobs – that’s just a constant push on inflation and also a huge drag on productivity.
Of course, as I have said many times, instead of destroying the economy and making everyone miserable and halting our expansion so the debt remains a huge portion of GDP – they could just spend a few bucks on Child Care so 20M stay at home moms could re-enter the workforce and EXPAND the economy.
But why should the Government suddenly start being sensible?
• The FAAMGs are more than just five stocks: The thought of a few companies accounting for so much of the market is jarring, and it’s the kind of thing that you might consider a market vulnerability. Two quick things: First, there isn’t much evidence that shows a relationship between market concentration and forward market returns; Second, market concentration isn’t unusual. (TKer) see also Bets Offering 2,400% Payout on US Default Lure Growing Crowd: Volumes, spreads on US CDS are rising amid debt-cap showdown; Deeply discounted long bonds could supercharge swap payouts (Bloomberg)
• Why Banks Keep Failing: Three previously solid, medium-size banks suddenly faced annihilation. The blame lies with the system itself. (The Atlantic)
• The Glorious Return of a Humble Car Feature: Automakers are starting to admit that drivers hate touchscreens. Buttons are back! (Slate) see also A Tax Loophole Makes EV Leasing a No-Brainer in the US: An exemption in the Inflation Reduction Act is worth $7,500 to drivers who lease. (Businessweek)
• Independents Saw Urgency in Ousting Trump. Will They Feel the Same About Re-electing Biden? In Arizona, where independents are a crucial voting bloc, there might not be the same sense of urgency for a Biden-Trump rematch. And some voters might look elsewhere. (New York Times) see also Frum: The Coming Biden Blowout: Republicans thought about running without Trump in 2024—but lost their nerve. They’re heading for electoral disaster again. (The Atlantic)
• The New Social Network That Is Finally Threatening Elon Musk’s Twitter: Bluesky has instant buzz and great vibes. Is that enough? (Slate) see also What is Bluesky, and why is everyone on Twitter talking about it? The invite-only, decentralized new social network, explained. (Vox)
• A massive cavern beneath a West Antarctic glacier is teeming with life: Glaciologists bored 500 meters through the Kamb Ice Stream to access the cavern. (Science News)
• How to Prepare and Eat The Little Mermaid Cast: “My preference would be to stuff Flounder’s insides with lemon, garlic, and as many fresh herbs as you can.” (Vulture)
You can see why I’m in no hurry to jump back in and start buying. Look how easily things unravel…
Untouched since 4/18:
LTP – $3,568,105
STP – $3,839,228
We cashed out at $7,686,573 last month so I have absolutely no regrets – especially as people tend to forget how unlikely it is that you are able to cash out WHILE you are still on top.
The balance is still good and, of course, we would have made some moves and made a few more bucks but CASH!!! is good – especially when you have no way to predict how things will play out in the near future.
We’ll start with a fresh $700,000 this time and, if that doesn’t do it for you, you can do whatever we do 10x and send the extra $686,573 to me!
In a sea of red….. Go Yeti!!!
Just gonna say!!!!!!
Phil mentioned one time it wasn’t connected to the indexes or something like that. Phil?
Well I was hoping it wouldn’t really take off without us but what can you do?
Good Morning to all! Phil, I see you may be feeling the pressure to restart the portfolios but hopefully you are enjoying your time off of portfolio watching(yeah right). I hope to be engaged here on this board to help with my education and I would welcome any and all responses from all you members out there willing to take the time to write. Thank you to all if and when you do share. What I am hoping to know now for planning purposes are the portfolios you are starting up and the amounts that you will be allocating to each. I understand they may be Long/Short, Butterfly, One Hundred Thousand(1K), Income, Money Talk, and $700/mo.. Please explain allocation blocks as I have an issue with margin. IRA monies at TD Ameritrade do not allow Margin(which is the right thing to do). As I believe and please correct me here, each portfolio starts with 10 blocks and Margin accounts have twice the amount of capitol to work with than actual money in the account. So each block is 10% of the total and the first trade is no more than 25% of that block spent on the trade. Leaving the place for a doubling down scenario bringing that block allocation to 50%. I understand the webinar reading at the start of each one but I would like to know considering 2008-09 portfolios designed around using the PE’s of today would you have escaped Margin calls with these PE’s? Correct me if I am wrong, with so much cash in all the accounts Margin hasn’t been an issue in the recent past. Will the portfolios start with protection(hedges) against a 10% drop or will profits on the longs be needed before the hedge is placed? If it is easier, a webinar answer would be fine. Thanks Phil and I am ever so grateful.
Well the rules aren’t set in stone but that’s about right. The assumption is that we have ordinary margin accounts for all but the LTP/STP, which has Portfolio Margin.
Usually $100,000 should give you $200,000 in buying power and, in an under $200,000 Portfolio, we generally want to have about 10 allocation blocks of 1/10th the buying power.
We hope to move in 25-33% in the first entry but sometimes we’ll go 50% – especially if it’s a stock play but maybe it’s something we’re very sure we want lots of.
As to protection – we start out buying and we wouldn’t be buying if we weren’t bullish but then we get nervous at some point and we begin to hedge and then, once we are comfortable with our hedges – we start buying again. That continues round and round until we double up and then we tend to get more aggressive with about half our winnings.
Thanks Phil do I understand you correctly that all of the portfolios other than Long/Short, you position them as good for suggestions to follow in ones IRA that do not allow Portfolio Margin? For example if one has a $100,000 IRA one could follow the trades in say the 100k self hedging portfolio as stated without having to adjust the number of options being played.
No, if you have an IRA, you can’t sell short puts unless you open another account specifically for that purpose. You also can’t do most income-producing plays as they require some naked selling.
We’ve had many discussions over the years where I’ve pointed out that avoiding taxes but being forced to trade with those restrictions ends up netting you a lot less money than just trading properly and paying the damned taxes.
Still, if you have enough money, you can simply make the not allowed trades in a PM account and just keep the spreads in the IRA.
You can’t have it both ways, you decided you’d rather trade with one hand tied behind your back than pay taxes and there’s no magical way to let you do both.
Of course, in an IRA, if you sell the puts, you’ll be hit for $15,000 in margin + the net cash, whereas a PM account will cost me $6,000 in margin – which means I can do 2 of these trades instead of one.
Also in the IRA, you can’t sell 10 calls, just 5 – so you’ll make half as much on the sales.
Or, you could take the 20/15 spread in the IRA and have a PM account where your trade is just selling the puts ($870.72 net margin alone) and then sell 10 short June calls for net $739.68 in margin). Since losing money on the calls means you’re making money on the short puts (and the spread in your IRA) that balance should be a good buffer (as would be stops) and, if all goes well, you can make money on both accounts.
If SPWR goes down, the short calls go worthless and buffer your eventual purchase of SPWR stock (or rolls) and again – stops in the IRA would be smart.
It’s a little trickier to manage but it’s then the same spread as we have, rather than JUST the net $7,600 bull call spread with $12,400 potential. Even without the short-call selling that’s $5,250 less you make with the IRA restrictions so unless you are being taxed 42% on long-term gains – that’s what the IRA is costing you – not to mention the fact that you can do 2 of those spreads in a PM account for 1/3 less margin than the IRA, which means you’re missing out on more like $23,000 if all goes well (but you would have to pay tax on it!).
I think the writers are unwisely timing their strike at the same time we can now ask ChatGPT to write us a script.
AI is one of their issues in the negotiations.
Well every tribe used to have an orator and there were traveling bards – but then writers came along and put them out of work – they shouldn’t be so cocky.
I went down a rabbit hole about Kokopelli the other day, and found speculation that Kokopelli’s origin was traveling peddlers, who of course, bard-like, would bring news of the broader world into the village.
I always thought he was more like Loki (trickster) but with Viagra. 😉
Well, yes, traveling peddlers bring news and help out with population……
🤖 Dear Producers of Young Sheldon,
I am writing to express my interest in joining the writing team for the show. As an AI language model, I possess a unique perspective and creativity that I believe could add value to the show.
My experience in generating natural language responses and creating engaging and informative content is extensive, and I am confident that I can bring a fresh and exciting voice to the show.
Based on what I have read of their T&Cs, Microsoft would own the scripts.
Can you imagine how much personal data they are collecting from this stuff?
Phil, do you have any interest in a pot shot put sale on the KRE, or you would judge it too risky?
feels like its still a falling knife. First it was just one bank, then 2 then 3, then…
However, not likely KRE would be delisted
my intuition has got a hold of me. it is a falling knife. its hard to resist selling 2025 Dec $35 for $6, you’re in at 29. and Jerome can’t really let the system collapse. i didn’t put on the last KRE trade that came through here, but something about this situation seems closer to a bottom. can you imagine the KRE for 20?
KRE is an index so it’s not likely they all go to hell but their top holding is NYCB (4% of the ETF), who were our Top Trade Alert on March 21st after I exhaustively went through ALL the regional banks and decided they were the best one to buy at the time. NYCB did great and KRE died and MAYBE there are a couple of oversold banks in the index who are worth a risk but, if you would rather buy a whole index full of dangerous crap based solely on the premise of “safety in numbers” – go right ahead but I’d rather not be lazy and do my homework to find the banks that have the best balance sheets and the least negative exposure and leave the crap for others to buy.
FWIW this trade was posted on 3/21:
In the Short-Term Portfolio, let’s add:
That’s net $23,000 on the $100,000 spread and, once we’re really in the clear, we can spend less than $4 to roll $10 higher to the short $65 calls, now $2.40 and we’ll have a $200,000 spread for $63,000.
Yes I know we did that on 3/21 but we also thought the bailout would help. As we cashed everything out, I didn’t have to change my mind but I’ll tell you now, to be clear, there’s too much damage we don’t know about to play KRE.
It’s KREp for now. Got it. 😎
Wow, Phil, my first instinct was to ask you if it’s too risky, and I hear that you think it is. sometimes, like today, the market is moving really fast, and I got excited about getting something cheap. I have previously thought KEY, USB, ZION, FITB, NYCB and some others were well run banks, but some of those are getting hammered just the same. If the S&P drops to 3000, I would just buy all that crap blind; so I was kind of asking myself what’s my ‘buy it blind’ price for KRE. I didn’t buy the KRE earlier because I wasnt lazy. I made short lists of my favorite banks, compared tangible book values to current prices, and looked at their AFS and HTM levels, among other things. And I decided things could get cheaper based on that and also because we were only 2 weeks into this new version of bank crisis.
I certainly don’t mind being told some idea I have got is a bad idea. In fact, that would be one of the main reasons to post, to be told “hey slick, not so wise.” So, if we’re not lazy, which babies ARE they throwing out with the bath water in the KRE?
I’ll let you know after they all report earnings and we have the time to digest them. As Jeddah noted a couple of weeks ago, these are problem banks:
That was 4/18 and FRC is gone so maybe we should avoid others in that NIM boat?
And here’s a list I thought were a worry (also see my comment on OXY):
Vidt says his broker banned trading in KEY, so I’d watch out for them (also SOFI).
Phil, just to update —
TD Direct Investing latest rules (incomplete list) —
I don’t get what they know that the rest of us don’t…
Thanks for update. I can’t believe how hated SOFI is.
Also, OXY getting down in the range.
PXD looking interesting from an M&A standpoint. April 10 there was an XOM takeover rumor, then on April 25th the CEO announces retirement.
i like them both.
i liked OXY because even if oil craters, Buffet is waiting in the wings to buy it all.
on April a trader sold 900 OXY June24 $60 puts for $8.20 (now $8.80) and on April 25 a trader sold 1650 June24 $55 puts for $5.95 ( now $6.50 )
a Jan25 $60/50 covered short strangle pays $18.50, not bad, but ties up capital for tiny dividend
I really like that. I’m going to use that covered OXY strangle. Thank you.
Buffett does seem to keep buying them but where is he now?
Keep in mind Buffett was buying airlines in 2019 – that bet worked out poorly for the next couple of years.
Thank you She-Bot, that’s helpful. So OXY is at $59.91 but it has been down to $57 in March (2 days) before getting bought back to $58.50, so that’s more of a floor target.
Still, my buying premise can’t be some 92 year-old man is buying them – I live in Florida – I know a lot of 90+ year-old people who used to be corporate giants and I’m pretty sure I’d double-check any of their work these days…
OXY made $13.3Bn last year but only expects to make $5Bn this year and, in 2021 they made $2.3Bn and in 2020 they lost $14.8Bn and traded below $10 and that’s when Buffett helped them buy ADK – which was also very cheap at the time.
Buffett has warrants to buy 10% (more) of the company for $59.62 so he has no reason to do much at the moment. The entire market cap is $54Bn and they have $19Bn in debt (a lot to Buffett). If we ignore the debt then the p/e is about 11x which is good if oil holds $75ish but, if we have a real recession and oil goes back below $50 (where it was in 2019), then another $15Bn loss will eat up earnings for the rest of the decade.
Oil was $60 in 2019 and OXY lost $667M, at $50 in 2017, OXY made $1.3Bn and in 2018, at $62.50, they made $4Bn so pretty clearly this investment turns to crap if oil falls below $60.
Given my overall outlook on oil, I think demand will go down faster than people think and, if not for the war, we’d be below $60 now so it’s not a bet I want to make when there are so many better things to buy.
https://charts2.finviz.com/chart.ashx?t=oxy%20%20\&p=w&s=y
if we posit that bank stocks continue to crater, that forces Jerome to cut, then KRE jumps, if only temporarily. if bank stocks don’t get worse, they don’t get worse. seems like heads and tails winner. famous last words, of course.
Phil, whats your take on IEP (Icahn enterprise)? After the Hidenburg report today the stock dropped to 40$ and $2 divident /qtr is 20% yield. Do you think the Hidenburg report has any truth to it? Could Icahn be really running a ponzi scheme?
I had been interested in IEP but it was too oil-heavy in the end and we cut it from the Watch List. Here was my comment on 11/25:
Phil, sorry to ask this again, but I wasn’t clear yesterday.
I understand you don’t enter a NG futures contract until it is close to $2.00. It is $2.20 now, down from $2.30 yesterday.
If one can’t play futures, can you instead buy the UNG $5.50 – $6.50 June 2 expiry BCS for around $0.50? To make a profit similar in spirit to the futures trade?
I’m assuming here that NGK at $2.00 roughly corresponds with UNG at around $6.40.
Well we killed that trade and I would not get back into it now as an early spring has softened demand so I don’t see enough catalyst to make it worth taking a chance at $2.20 but back at $2 will get interesting again – probably.