Trump vs. the U.S. Economy

Trump vs. the U.S. Economy

By Ezra Klein, NY Times 

It has been some months since Liberation Day. We have seen tariffs come on and off — and go up and down. We have seen all kinds of other economic policies applied and pushed. But the amazing thing about the American economy right now is that it’s shaky but pretty stable.

The place where we’re seeing some stress is in the job market. You’ve seen the jobs numbers revised downward for recent months. So was the beginning of all this really putting pressure on the American economy? Or is the underlying resilience and power of the economy going to push through?

Read transcript or listen to here >

Summary of Ezra Klein Interview with Natasha Sarin

Context

Seven months into Trump’s presidency and four months into the trade war (“Liberation Day”), the U.S. economy faces stress from tariffs and political intervention. While still relatively stable, growth is slowing, inflationary pressures are rising, and the labor market is beginning to weaken. Trump’s administration is intervening directly in institutions like the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and pressuring the Federal Reserve — raising questions about long-term stability and credibility.

A. Overview 

1. State of the U.S. Economy

• Pre-Trump baseline: The economy was strong coming out of the pandemic. Inflation was declining toward the Fed’s 2% target, and the labor market was robust.

• Trump’s policies: Instead of maintaining this momentum, the administration launched a tariff-driven trade war, producing the most inflationary policies in decades.

• Growth slowdown: U.S. GDP growth has fallen to ~1.2% versus ~2.5% expected. Tariffs are projected to shrink GDP by 0.4 percentage points annually, costing households ~$1,000 per year.

2. Tariffs: Scale, Structure, and Effects

• Effective tariff rate: Rose from ~2.5% (pre-Trump) to ~18% now. China, Mexico, India, and Brazil face especially high rates (50–60% in some cases).

• Consumer impact: Tariffs raise prices broadly because imports make up ~11% of the economy and many “domestic” goods (e.g., cars) contain large imported components. Durable goods (furniture, electronics, apparel) are hit hardest.

• Why prices haven’t spiked more: Companies pre-stocked inventories ahead of tariffs, temporarily cushioning consumers. But as inventories shrink, prices are rising.

• Economic distortion: Tariffs redirect activity from efficient sectors into less productive domestic ones, suppressing growth and consumption. Domestic manufacturing investment has not meaningfully increased.

3. Trade Policy and Geopolitics

• Lack of clear strategy: Tariffs don’t consistently target adversaries; they are used as political leverage (e.g., punishing India for Russian oil, Brazil over Bolsonaro prosecutions).

• Deals with allies: The EU “win” raised tariffs from 1.5% to ~15% — effectively a large tax on American consumers. Similar hollow deals exist with Japan and others.

• Revenue: If tariffs remain, they could raise ~$3 trillion over a decade, but this is a regressive and growth-slowing form of taxation.

4. Fiscal and Tax Policy Implications

• Tariffs are bad taxes: They disproportionately hit lower- and middle-income households, unlike progressive taxes. They drag on productivity and growth.

• Alternative taxes: Sarin favors progressive consumption or carbon taxes as smarter revenue sources. Tariffs might eventually evolve into a poorly designed version of such taxes, but with more distortion.

• Fiscal sustainability: The U.S. faces rising debt-to-GDP, worsened by Trump’s tax cuts. Tariffs offset some fiscal pressure but in inefficient ways.

5. Labor Market Stress

• Recent job reports: Hiring has stalled across most sectors except health care and A.I. tech. Without health care, recent months would have shown net job losses.

• Revisions: Downward revisions of ~258,000 jobs (~0.16% of the labor force) indicate the labor market is weakening, aligning with slowing growth.

• Risks of politicization: Trump fired the BLS head after job revisions, raising concerns about data integrity. U.S. economic data has historically been a “gold standard,” but credibility could erode if politicized.

6. Institutional Pressure: BLS and the Federal Reserve

• BLS concerns: While civil servants produce the data, politicization risks morale and long-term talent. Sarin warns of Argentina- or Greece-like crises if data becomes unreliable.

• Federal Reserve: Trump pressures for dramatic rate cuts (up to 3%), though inflationary tariffs make cuts counterproductive. Historical precedent (Nixon–Burns) shows political Fed pressure worsened inflation.

• Risk of stagflation: The combination of slowing growth, higher prices, and pressure to cut rates resembles stagflation — a policy-induced problem.

7. Artificial Intelligence as a Wild Card

• Growth driver: A.I. investment has cushioned GDP against tariffs. Without it, the economy might look recessionary.

• Uncertainty: A.I. may boost productivity or displace jobs. So far, data shows no job displacement, but investment levels suggest expectations of eventual replacement.

• Possible bubble: A.I. could mirror the dot-com era — frothy investment followed by correction, after which real productivity gains take hold.

• Societal impact: If A.I. truly simulates human labor, it could expand the labor pool indefinitely, driving both productivity and displacement. The U.S. is unprepared for retraining and transition challenges.

8. Immigration, Demographics, and Labor Supply

• Trump’s stance: Restricting immigration and deporting workers despite falling birthrates and an aging population.

• Economic reality: Immigration is essential for labor supply and productivity growth. Without it, demographic decline worsens economic prospects.

• Inconsistency: The administration’s logic on immigration suppressing wages is not supported by evidence. If they applied the same logic to A.I., they should fear wage suppression — but they don’t.

9. Key Risks and Outlook

• Self-inflicted fragility: The U.S. economy is shakier not because of external shocks but because of policy choices (tariffs, tax cuts, institutional interference).

• Potential stagflation: Inflationary tariffs + slowing growth = difficult Fed policy trade-offs. The Fed cutting rates too sharply could repeat past mistakes.

• Dependence on A.I.: Future stability hinges on whether A.I. delivers rapid productivity growth. Without it, growth will lag.

• Fiscal path: Tariffs raise revenue but distort the economy. Long-term reform should aim for progressive, simple, growth-friendly taxes.

• Institutional integrity: Politicizing data and central banking risks undermining trust in U.S. economic governance.

10. Sarin’s Perspective

• Caution: The U.S. has tools (reversing tariffs, smart tax reform, A.I. innovation). However, the current trajectory is fragile and avoidably harmful.

• Dream reforms: Simplify the tax code, strengthen social benefits (esp. Child Tax Credit), and resist capture by special interests.

B. Technology, A.I., and the Economy

1. A.I. as the Key Offset to Tariff Drag

• Sarin emphasizes that A.I. investment is the only major factor keeping growth afloat despite tariff-induced slowdown.

• Without A.I., the economy might already look recessionary.

• GDP gains are heavily dependent on continued tech-driven capital expenditures.

2. Uncertain Payoff: Productivity or Displacement?

• A.I.’s long-term impact is ambiguous:

  • It could boost productivity by making workers more efficient.

  • Or it could displace large segments of the workforce, since A.I. simulates human tasks directly.

• Heavy investment levels suggest expectations of eventual replacement, not just incremental productivity gains.

3. Historical Parallels and Bubble Risk

• Sarin likens the current surge in A.I. spending to the dot-com boom: frothy investment, followed by correction, and then real productivity gains once the technology matures.

• This pattern means short-term volatility but potentially transformative long-term benefits.

• If the A.I. bubble bursts, it could paradoxically accelerate adoption, as firms retool during recessionary periods.

4. Effects on Jobs and Labor Markets

• No current displacement shows up in unemployment data — even in A.I.-exposed sectors.

• However, A.I. is already changing job training: e.g., economists no longer need to spend years learning coding/debugging thanks to A.I. tools.

• Past examples (ATMs, calculators, Photoshop) suggest tools can initially complement workers, but over time displace them (as happened with bank tellers).

• The scale of A.I. investment suggests replacement is expected, not just augmentation.

5. Social and Workforce Challenges

• If A.I. simulates human labor at scale, it effectively expands the global labor pool without limit, raising profound social and wage implications.

• Transition risks:

  • Displacement could be “nightmarish” without effective retraining or social safety nets.

  • The U.S. has historically been bad at retraining (e.g., post-China trade shock).

• Long-term possibility: A.I. could move society toward shorter workweeks or fundamentally new labor structures — but the path there is highly disruptive.

6. Interaction with Demographics and Immigration

• Sarin contrasts Trump’s anti-immigration stance with the promise of A.I.:

  • Immigration boosts labor supply and productivity.

  • If immigration is cut, the U.S. becomes even more dependent on A.I. to sustain growth.

• Trump’s view that “more labor = lower wages” (used to justify anti-immigration policies) would logically also apply to A.I., but his administration doesn’t recognize that contradiction.

7. Market Concentration and Instability

• Much of the stock market’s strength is built on seven tech giants, heavily tied to A.I. development.

• This concentration creates instability — if A.I. underperforms, the entire market could falter.

• Sarin stresses that this fragility resembles the late ’90s, when unexpected productivity gains from computerization reshaped the economy.

8. Hope and Caution

• Optimistic scenario: A.I. delivers a massive leap in per-worker productivity, similar to the computerization boom of the late 1990s.

• Caution: The scale of investment needed to justify current valuations implies significant disruption is unavoidable.

• Society hasn’t grappled with the consequences: what happens if A.I. really replaces vast categories of work?

C. Political Dimensions and Trump’s Influence on the Economy

1. Chaotic and Aimless Trade Policy

• No clear objectives: Sarin highlights the incoherence of Trump’s tariffs. They are not tightly focused on adversaries like China; instead, they’re inconsistently imposed on allies and trading partners.

• Political leverage: Tariffs often appear to be tools of geopolitical punishment or reward, linked to unrelated issues (e.g., Brazil over Bolsonaro prosecutions, India over Russian oil).

• Outcome: This undermines credibility and growth, slowing GDP while failing to deliver promised manufacturing booms or strategic gains.

2. Politicization of Economic Data (BLS)

• Trump fired the BLS head after downward job revisions, despite revisions being routine and minor.

• Risk: Politicizing data risks destroying trust in U.S. statistics, historically viewed worldwide as the “gold standard.”

• Consequences: Loss of trust could echo crises in Argentina or Greece, where manipulated data led to sovereign debt crises and investor flight.

• Broader theme: Trump’s willingness to fire officials for politically inconvenient truths reflects an authoritarian impulse that weakens institutional integrity.

3. Pressure on the Federal Reserve

• Interest rate cuts: Trump demanded dramatic rate cuts (up to 3%), despite tariffs being highly inflationary.

• Historical warning: Sarin notes Nixon pressured Fed Chair Arthur Burns to cut rates ahead of an election, which fueled 1970s inflation.

• Stagflation risk: Trump’s push combines inflationary policies with demands for looser money — a recipe for stagflation.

4. The “Big, Beautiful Bill” and Fiscal Recklessness

• Trump’s tax cuts: Deeply regressive, disproportionately benefiting the wealthy while worsening debt-to-GDP.

• Tariffs as a cover: Sarin acknowledges tariffs raise ~$3 trillion in revenue, but this is an inefficient, regressive tax. Trump uses it to justify fiscally reckless tax cuts — essentially robbing consumers to subsidize elites.

5. Undermining Institutions and Norms

• Erosion of talent and morale: Sarin warns that politicizing BLS or agencies like the Fed discourages capable civil servants and risks long-term degradation of data quality.

• Complicity in government: She critiques figures like Kevin Hassett, who justified Trump’s firing of the BLS head despite knowing it undermined credibility.

• No lines: In Sarin’s view, serving in the Trump administration increasingly means abandoning institutional norms and enabling authoritarian behavior.

6. Political Short-Termism vs. Economic Reality

• Self-inflicted harm: Sarin repeatedly stresses that current weakness is not due to an external crisis (like COVID or 2008), but deliberate policy choices: tariffs, tax cuts, institutional interference.

• Markets and allies: By raising tariffs on allies while claiming victories, Trump damages long-term credibility and relationships, weakening both U.S. economic resilience and global partnerships.

• Core problem: Policies are driven by short-term political wins and messaging rather than coherent strategy, leaving the economy more fragile and volatile.

✅ Core Takeaways:

The U.S. economy is stable but under stress from policy-driven risks: inflationary tariffs, fiscal mismanagement, politicization of data, and institutional pressure. The labor market is weakening, and the economy is increasingly reliant on uncertain A.I. gains. The long-term outlook depends on whether A.I. delivers real productivity growth, whether tariffs persist, and whether U.S. institutions retain their credibility.

Sarin sees A.I. as both the bright spot and the biggest risk in today’s economy. It cushions GDP against policy-driven harm, but its payoff is uncertain: will it complement workers, or displace them on a massive scale? The U.S. is unprepared for the transition — lacking retraining capacity, reliant on A.I. due to demographic decline, and dangerously concentrated in a few tech giants. The outcome could be transformative productivity or destabilizing disruption, depending on how policy and society adapt.

Sarin sees Trump’s economic approach as chaotic, authoritarian, and self-sabotaging. By weaponizing tariffs for politics, undermining data integrity, pressuring the Fed, and enacting regressive fiscal policy, Trump injects uncertainty and fragility into an economy that was otherwise on strong footing. The damage isn’t just short-term inflation and slower growth — it’s the erosion of trust in institutions that underpin U.S. market stability.

This post was originally published on this site