login | become a member

Archive for July 2nd, 2008

Wednesday Wipe Out

As the great Dr. Smith used to say: "Oh the pain, the pain!"

Of course, it was a simpler time back then, when it was OK for a grown man to hold a young boy with only robotic supervision…  These days we have robots placing trades and young boys speculating in oil while grown men still cry oh, the pain, the pain!

We were very lucky that we got a nice exit on our QID puts early in the morning and extremely lucky that we made a few good directional calls.  Yesterday at 11:11, with the Dow at 11,346 I said "So the bottom line is I didn’t like the way our leaders are trading, running into too much profit taking.  Adding out of the money covers in general and waiting to see which way we break.  XXX" then at 12:59, with the Dow down to 11,217, I called for 1/2 covers on our DIA puts by selling the $112 puts for $2.30 - those gave us a quick $1 this morning. 

Even with the Dow climbing to 11,379 as oil fell back to $140ish in the afternoon, at 2:54 Cramer was on CNBC and I said: "Wow, Cramer just came on telling us how bullish we should be about this.  Am I crazy or did he just tell us to sell everything and crawl into a hole yesterday?"  We noted it was, of all things, a GM-driven rally and I said at 3:19 "GM’s sales were only off 8.3% because they had 0% 72-month financing and $7,000 rebates.  Ford, who didn’t have those incentives was off 18%.  This is even dumber than Bush’s money giveaway because the GM management will still be there when this bill comes due (or maybe they don’t plan on it!)."  And what are the rumors today?  That GM may be going bankrupt - they are NOT planning on being around to pay the bill! 

That is fundamental logic in action.  Outside of energy trading, the universe often makes sense and the markets can be predicted with better than average results by a person paying attention.  We had an extensive after-hours discussion about the oil con and I urge you to read it but I am getting tired of discussing it.  The bottom line is, the scam will go on as long as it does and only when it stops will we be able to get bullish on the markets (unless we enter into general hyper-inflation, including wages, to help pay for it).

 As I said at 3:40 yesterday: "Keep in perspective what a weak, pathetic bounce this is coming off a 500-point drop since last Wednesday.  As with yesterday, we need to close over 11,450 for it to mean anything and that doesn’t look likely.  Also how many days in a row can oil hit $140 and then get pumped back to $142.50 the next day?"  Well, after today, it turns out the answer is - at least one more!

In yesterday’s wrap-up I said: "While we remain a little weary of any rally that is led by GM, we did hold our levels and that’s all we aimed to do this morning.  Tomorrow we get the always random ADP report and the market closes early on Thursday so we’re still going to have to be well covered into the weekend, no matter what the markets do tomorrow.  I’ll be happy if we can just hold 11,400 for the week as it might just look like we’re forming a bottom."  This morning I reminded members that the Dow has been moving in perfect counter-step to crude for weeks and that was all we could expect from the market.   Take a look at this day chart you decide if oil is driving this market or not.

THAT IS WHY I AM STILL IN A GOOD MOOD!  These chart people are idiots (not you, Tom, the other chart people!).  There is no "secular bear market" here.  There is a single, identifyable thing that is affecting the markets for 6 months as oil has skyrocketed from $80 to $145 a gallon (up 80%).  It has driven up food prices and robbed global consumers of $45 x 86M = $3.9Bn PER DAY in spending power.  How much money do you think corporations make?  That’s $1.4Tn a year that can’t be used to buy IPhones or repay home loans or… EAT! 

As Curly says, the secret to life (and this market) is ONE THING and that one thing is oil.  Oil is, of course, pushing other commodities higher and devaluing the dollar as $12Bn of them are burned each day to pay for something of no lasting value.  And that is the key, this is not demand driven price increases, there is no economic growth being fueled by fuel consumption that is driving prices higher.  Quite the opposite - rising fuel prices have begun to curb spending and production and is grinding the global economy to a halt and decreasing the demand for crude but, unlike anything in the history of supply and demand - this only spurs speculators to run oil to even higher levels.  I said last week that something has to give at $142.50 and what gave yesterday was the market and what gives next is the global economy but IT IS ALL DUE TO JUST ONE THING!

Here’s where our investing premise gets tricky then.  If your car is great but it doesn’t work because of a spark-plug, you buy a spark plug,  If it needs brakes, you buy breaks or a fuel line or whatever it needs but, if your car works perfectly well but you can’t afford the gas to drive it, it’s going to go nowhere.  That is the state of our economy now and it will continue to be the state until the administration takes action.  What drives me nuts is the action is easy to take

Lower the price of oil by:

  • Releasing oil from the SPR.  We have 710Mb stored and 5Mb a week will flood the US market with crude and bring us to the highest commercial inventory levels in 5 years within 6 weeks.  That uses 5% of the SPR and would force oil longs to "get real" about their contracts.  The US can even purchase 5Mb of futures contracts per week to refill the SPR at a certain date.  Let’s say I release 5Mb a week and buy 5Mb of oil for Aug deliver and 5Mb for Sept etc.  I can release 5Mb for 24 weeks in a row (that’s 6 months for you laymen) and already be contracted to have the SPR fully refilled in 18 months at ZERO net cost (the long contracts are cheaper than what I can sell it for today).
  • Reign in speculation.  There are many ways being discussed in Congress to do this - Just do it!
  • Have an energy policy.  Something like: 
    • Accelerating the raising of mileage requirements to get from 20 to 30 mpg by 2014.  That means we will require the US fleet to have 10% better mileage in the 2010 model year.
    • Reach a drilling compromise with Congress and award new drilling sites only to companies who bring on new production from the sites they already have under contract.   That seems simple enough, if you want the rights to drill 10% more land/sea than you now have, I just want to see you producing on 10% of the land/sea that we already gave you - sort of a replacement only program.
    • Require all government and commercial building to use CFLs within 12 months.  Aside from using 75% less energy, they also throw off less heat and lower air conditioning bills considerably (as well as peak load power requirements).
    • Fund alternate energy - for real!  Concentrate on things that will have a concrete impact within 24 months, like making solar installations very affordable, which boosts US industry, creates US jobs and has an immediate impact on energy costs and usage.
    • Call for a mulligan on ethanol.  Admit it was a mistake and revamp the program by guaranteeing to buy NEW acreage that is planted (again, the government can sell futures to offset it) and designate it for ethanol.  This will allow investors to be assured of fuel supplies at a fixed cost and the government could spur processing investment with incentives as well.  There are millions of unplanted acres in this country, if we have a coherent policy, everybody could make better plans.
    • Create a bi-partisan task force on Energy that will have wide powers to take action on anything from planting corn to trading futures and set a deadline for a sweeping report in January.  We did this for Iraq and 9/11, this is a crisis too.

So I’m bullish because all this can be brought quickly under control and I’m pissed off at Bush because it isn’t happening.  Call it a conspiracy or call it gross incompetency, either way the buck stops dead on his desk and, according to a recent poll, even 74% of the "Republicans" are now as angry as I am about this.  This whole economy can be fixed by taking action, ALMOST ANY ACTION WOULD DO, to bring down the price of oil.  The average American family is spending $200 a month more this year than last year on food and energy and $400 a month more than they paid in 2005.  $400 a month is $65,000 worth of mortgage payments over 30 years at 7% - there’s your housing crisis solved right there as a bi-product of bringing down the oil price - PEOPLE CAN AFFORD THEIR MORTGAGE!

One thing I will say about Bush is that he is the most reliable market killer I’ve ever seen.  At 10:40, with the Dow up at 11,425 and oil at $141, the President decided it would be a good time to say he will send more troops (not less) into Afghanistan and then Paulson faced a lot of tough questions from European reporters, who weren’t pushovers for his BS like the White House Press Corps usually is as he once again denied that speculation is driving the oil markets, giving the green light for oil speculators to take crude to new levels.

 We shorted crude into those levels, looking for $150 (sick as it is) to hold.  Let MS/GS have their July 4th target and we’ll be the ones selling what all these sheep are buying, very much like my favorite movie scene in trading places.  As I mentioned, our logic is extensively detailed in last night’s chat and you are either a believer or you aren’t.  The fact that coal was diving while oil was rising didn’t strike anyone in the media as strange so we’ll just ignore it as well (other than our hugely profitable PCX and FDG puts).

All in all, it was another terrible day on the markets but so what?  It’s all about one thing and that one thing won’t last.  The dollar won’t go to zero and oil won’t go to $200, I’m not even sure they can make $150 but we’ll see...

 

 

 


PSW After Dark

A lot of people wonder what it is that you get with our Basic Membership package and my simple answer to that is "more of the same.

Much, much more!

Basic members in additon to having access to our portfolios and special members only posts and sections, get to view my intraday comments and selections live during market hours and, after the market closes, they get the full brunt of the member chat which, tonight, went something like this (but it looks much nicer on the chat board):

 

  • Phil
    July 2nd, 2008 at 3:59 pm |     

    GM, TSO, FSLR and PCX - I just get bored telling people to short them after a while…  I’m getting bored telling people oil is a scam at this point too, I’m ready to just enjoy the ride up to whatever insane level they decide to print because this is going to be one hell of a ride down.

    David, do you have a link to that or citations, I’d love to use it later.

    Ooh, VIX very angry!  That’s nice at least…

    Pretty good volume for a holiday week.

    GM - .27 for the Aug $5 puts says a lot about what people think.  The Aug $10 puts are $1.85, that’s spotting you 18% in the price of the stock for 50 days!

    Joseph - Ah so true,  I hope to hear my daughters one day say "Daddy, what’s a Republican?"  I think they’ve screwed themselves out of the next 12 years of government and that’s being kind.

    " Vogel and Mahoney claim that the disclosure chopped $7 billion worth of shareholder value from Apple’s stock in the two weeks following the June 2006 disclosure that the company had discovered backdating in its past. Their problem, however, is that Apple’s stock has basically tripled since then, as the company has continued to sell gobs of Macs, iPods, and, more recently, iPhones."

    Greg - you are a smart guy.  Amazing 4 weeks in a row the market is a disaster.  Like I said, this must be how the Hang Seng traders must have felt when their market was "only" down 20% and probably at 30%, 40% and now at 50% off they are saying the same thing - "How can it possibly go any lower?"

    PCX - yeah, I got out too early too.  I’m surprised it didn’t turn back up with oil.  One would almost think that the oil price was BS and the coal guys know it.

    Ben was warned by the ECB at their last meeting that if the US didn’t do something Europe would act without them, well here it comes.

  • July 2nd, 2008 at 3:59 pm |      

    wow, what an ugly last hour–doesn’t look good for tomorrow

  •  

     

  • xian
    July 2nd, 2008 at 4:00 pm |      

    RMM- they have to communicate…i dont know about coordinating, but to make informed decisions on either side they’d have to take each others temperatures.

    but they both want to b independent- yet at this juncture they r both tied to oil and only the USD can influence it.

  • July 2nd, 2008 at 4:00 pm |      

    occam - feel free to mail me the 50% if it’ll make you feel better. I’ll send you a few putters in return.

  •  

     

  • Alex
    July 2nd, 2008 at 4:03 pm |      

    This was heavy. But logically we can´t live with this Oil jumping 1$ per day and the dollar falling 0.4% per day.
    My porfolio is complete market neutral only selling premiums for now.

  • July 2nd, 2008 at 4:03 pm |      

    What a bunch of jamokes.  They’ve been waiting all day to flash up "Bear Market" is official now since we closed down.  They are so giddy that Michelle Caruso Cabrera is doing a double chest thrust today.

  •  

     

  • occam
    July 2nd, 2008 at 4:08 pm |      

    Mck - still time to short PCX another day — if you look at it’s monthly chart it is absolutely insane.  It’s rise may have been steeper than BIDU or FSLR.

  • July 2nd, 2008 at 4:19 pm |      

    Back into AAPL for a nibble.

  •  

     

  • mck
    July 2nd, 2008 at 4:23 pm |      

    occam - I’m with you, just untangling from chasing it up from 120 area instead of waiting for the chart to turn. There’s tons to be made now that it’s ranging, esp with the huge premiums.

  • July 2nd, 2008 at 4:28 pm |      

    "…enjoy the ride up to whatever insane level they decide to print because this is going to be one hell of a ride down."

    this is exactly my attitude.

  •  

     

  • windywheel
    July 2nd, 2008 at 4:39 pm |      

    listening to think or swim’s midyear review right now live
    the guy just said that AAPL doesn’t have any new products coming on line
    iphone is not a new story and american consumer has the attention span of a knat

  • July 2nd, 2008 at 4:42 pm |      

    Check out this site, its a live stream/search off of Twitter.  This allows you to search people "twitts" specific to stocks. Have a look at Howard Lindzons specifically. Make your own conclusions.
    http://stream.stocktwits.com/tagged/howardlindzon/page/2

  •  

     

  • xian
    July 2nd, 2008 at 4:42 pm |      

    windy- that’s about the attention span u should pay to that guy…bear is vogue

  • July 2nd, 2008 at 4:46 pm |      

    yeah, i’m not very impressed, to put it mildly
    it’s the first time i’m listening to it

    though he did just say that every trader he knows is long C

  •  

     

  • DB
    July 2nd, 2008 at 4:48 pm |      

    Well I was short FSLR untill it jumped last week. I remember Phil saying he’d short it when it got to $300 - which it never did. I never did get back in. But why’s it take such a hamerring today ?

    And why the damage to ISRG - it can’t all be because some analyst initiated coverage at Neutral with a "meets estimates" on earnings ???

    In my LTP i’m churning callers like there’s no tomorrow. Its taking about 3 days to chew through their premium and then I have to roll em down. But I’m not rolling down the long side because they’ll just get chewed. So I’m effectively selling lots of bear spreads. I’ll have to roll the longs to get position back - but not untill this has settled.

    Its all very depressing.

  • July 2nd, 2008 at 4:54 pm |      

    Phil,
    Is TIE getting beat up so bad just because of BA? Has anything changed your mind on the company? Do you still have the ‘09 15’s or are you rolling to the 12.5’s?

  •  

     

  • newparadigmz
    July 2nd, 2008 at 4:54 pm |      

    which guy Windy?

  • July 2nd, 2008 at 4:57 pm |      

    DB - I am right there with you. I feel your pain.

  •  

     

  • DBS
    July 2nd, 2008 at 5:01 pm |      

    Phil - Maybe you should ’school’ this guy.
    http://money.cnn.com/2008/07/01/magazines/fortune/birger_hunt.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008070205

  • Phil
    July 2nd, 2008 at 5:03 pm |      

    LOL Fred!  Hard to laugh after today though, just a total horror show.

    You know I’m wondering how there could not be a single world leader who is willing to stand up and put an end to this madness.   Oil is now at $144 after trading most of the regular hours below $142 and no one even mentions it or is outraged by it even though the global economy is collapsing around them.  It’s too bad everyone forgot what Reagan said: "Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same."

    Thinkswim - Wow, let the Apple bashing begin I guess. 

    That’s interesting Yev, wish I had time for all the cool little tools there are out there.

    ISRG just got caught up in the current.  In a rational world, this is a great buy point, about where we got in last time but, if we’re lucky, they could retest $225 on a big market sell-off.

    FSLR - Actually on the 23rd we did take the $270 puts for $12.50 and then rolled them to the $280 puts as they went up which ended up being $16.65, now $36.50.  I don’t think I ever made it an official portfolio trade but we did discuss it in chat.

    Be careful with a lot of bear spreads DB, you could get burned by a Fed move or something.

    TIE - still the $15s, it’s been too damn depressing to roll. 

  • windywheel
    July 2nd, 2008 at 5:10 pm |      

    newpara
    don’t know who the guy is
    now they’re just talking about new aspects to their site, which is ridiculously overwhelming as it is
    so i’m signing off. 
    good night all.

  • Phil
    July 2nd, 2008 at 5:10 pm |      

    DBS - Don’t forget they call Fortune "The capitalist’s tool" for a good reason.

    Wow, NVDA getting strangled, stabbed, shot, stabbed, poisoned and chopped up into little pieces for lowering guidance!  That’s going to send AAPL and other PC people lower I bet, then the semis…

  • vicky (Premium)
    July 2nd, 2008 at 5:10 pm |       

    Just a stupid thought… if the oil move is speculator driven and lets say their target is 170, is it not more profitable for "them" to drive the price down from 144 to 100  (44 points) based on the demand destruction thats happening instead of looking for another 26 points to the upside?
    Wonder if I will survive till the point when oil decides to go down.

  •       

    windy/C- well, that part’s good

  •  

     

  • troy (Premium)
    July 2nd, 2008 at 5:31 pm |       

    Phil - what is up w/the EIA?  Are they seriously trying to drive oil higher?

  •       

    I think I crapped my pants…Phil just quoted a republican!

  •  

     

  • vicky (Premium)
    July 2nd, 2008 at 5:37 pm |       

    Phil, do you AAPL covered in the 10KP. I uncovered this morning, but did not end well.

  •       

    Phil - The information came directly from the EIA site.  http;//tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/wcsstus1w.htm

    I used the 5/23 inventory number of 703,289,000 barrels against the 6/27 number of 705,823,000 for the total of 2,534,000 for the past four weeks and the 4/25 number of 701,339,000 barrels for the preceding four week total of 1,950,000.  The dollar value was based on oil at about $142/bbl.

    Keep in mind that H.R. 6022 did allow delivery of oil per an existing contract with the Secretary of the Interior.  The link to that is:  http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h6022/show

    As for the oil soaked nail comment about Bush, Paulson & Cheney, that was made up.  Sadly it has some truth to it…

    Keep kicking ass on the orial side!

  •  

     

  • xian (Premium)
    July 2nd, 2008 at 6:07 pm |      

    L.A., Miami Home Foreclosure Rates More Than Double (Update1)

  •       

    OOPS! Link to EIA is:     http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/wcsstus1w.htm

  •  

     

  • TM (Premium)
    July 2nd, 2008 at 6:32 pm |      

    The Truth about ANWR Drilling
    http://blog.heritage.org/2008/06/29/the-truth-about-anwr/

  •      

    thinking about fortune’s oil/silver argument. it would seem to make sense as the tech bubble was supply/demand driven. in terms of shares, once a fool bought a share, it was put in his account and unavailble until he put a sell order.

    this made me question my reasoning…BUT- float (ie supply) was real and always remained constant, unless there was a split or something- but then again, there really was a physical share u could have printed for u and take it home.

    the housing bubble fits better- as ive mentioned b4, in miami people were flipping the contracts on condo units that had never been built. developers would buy a site get some financing to start building and immediatly begin selling contracts on the unbuilt units…there was demand. 

    these new contracts, w/o a real unit behind them, r very much like OI- u can drive around miami and c halted/abandoned sites (ie no units available for delivery), but there’s a contract out there- even if only half the building was sold.

    the "demand" in oil is similar to this. it’s like a huge building of units that arent built, but the contracts r written (expanding OI) and being flipped back and forth.

    a bunch of institutions r holding these oil contracts as long term flippers- always rolling month to month and keeping OI elevated (across the entire board of futures contracts), eventhough the barrels r never delivered. then come in the scalpers/traders, who just game the liquidity as the longterm flippers roll contracts (ie selling pressure in the near months, and buying pressure in the further months) .

    the scalpers’ gaming effectively arbitrages the further months and the nearer months buy/sell pressure…this is y the delivered barrels close at the speculative price.

    if this makes sense (im a little confused myself and not too sure), then price will only begin to come down when the longterm flippers (institutions) start closing out positions- ie "sell to close" w/o paired to a new "buy to open"

    immediately the "arbitragers" will become overwhelmed (as they cant short to the instituion further out b/c the "buy to open" wont b there for them to pair against) and begin exiting themselves and the whole market collapses from w/in as well as from w/o- ie across the entire board.

    so if this does make sense (still not too sure), then we must ask "what will cause the institutions to reduce size"

    it would have to b demand destruction- which is already happening and likely to speed up.

    we will c this as total OI (summed across the entire borad starts to fall).

    commments/criticisms wanted

  •  

     

  • xian (Premium)
    July 2nd, 2008 at 6:42 pm |     

    …my head hurts…..

  •      

     

    Hey Phil. You are absolutely going to LOVE this………. It combines two of your favorite subjects: CNBC and OIL PRICES.
    nvestors are fretting over US$143 oil. Consumers are concerned about US$4 gas. But a recent story on CNBC.com really put this all in perspective. The story revealed how the high price of crude really stacks up against several other "necessities."

    The conclusion…oil’s actually pretty cheap at these levels.

    In fact, a trip to your favorite neighborhood sports bar will really give you sticker-shock. A barrel of Budweiser beer will set you back US$447.25.

    Would you like some Tabasco hot sauce for your chicken wings? That’ll cost you US$6,155.52 a barrel! Hmm…I’ll take mine mild.

    Switching to water to quench your thirst instead of beer won’t save you much either.

    A barrel of Perrier will set you back US$300.61 per barrel.
    How about a trip to your local neighbor Starbucks instead? Cost: US$954.24 a barrel. That’s only IF you take your coffee black. Adding milk will cost you another US$163.38 a barrel.
    Of course you can always just stay home, and drown your inflation sorrows in a pint of Ben & Jerry’s New York Super Fudge Chunk instead. Cost: US$1,609.44 a barrel.

  •  

     

  • xian (Premium)
    July 2nd, 2008 at 6:53 pm |      

    peter- LOL…this is a good question:

    what item in that  comparison doesnt belong and y?

    ill have to say crude doesnt belong b/c all the others items r refined/process products while crude is like digging up a bunch of dirt- it’s the raw material.

     

  •     
     

    Xian - Good point.
    To which I will answer: "What!. You’ve never had crude coffee before?"

    And…speaking of digging up a bunch of dirt…….Here’s a story you can tell next time the situation arises:

    You’ve made a pot of coffee and another person is pouring themselves a cup…..You tell them that the last person who drank your coffee complained: "This coffee tastes like mud!" to which you responded: " It should…..It was ground this morning!!!"

  •  

     

  • Phil (Premium)
    July 2nd, 2008 at 7:06 pm |       

    EIA - well there’s 86Mbd sold at $142 per barrel so that’s $12Bn a day or $4.45Tn a year.  What is the cost of bribing an EIA official?  I imagine if we say they are unbribably and it would take $50M of a combination of favors, junkets, presentations etc. to convince them that your view of peak oil is correct then that would be .0011% of the money that’s being made selling oil.

    If I spent $50M and targeted a dozen people over 5 years, I can have 8 of them telling you black is white if I want to….

    I thought you would like that JB!

    AAPL - sorry, I recovered them along with my other Apples but wasn’t specific.  Remind me and we’ll deal with it tomorrow.

    Thanks David!  I did realize the last bit was original…

    Xian - good thoughts, I’m off to dinner but will get back on that later.

     

  • Demetrius Michael (Premium)
    July 2nd, 2008 at 7:33 pm |      

     

    NYX - I should’ve taken the loss, thousands of dollars ago. I know it’s a great company, but sometimes the scar is just too deep. If I get 60, the stock is gone.

  •  

     

  • Demetrius Michael (Premium)
    July 2nd, 2008 at 7:38 pm |       

    Anyways I’m happy if we bounce tomorrow…. Everyone depressed? Check, time for an upday.

     

  •      

     

    today from excellent short seller, d kass today- (he’s shorting USO thru long DUG)

    "I will have more on my more upbeat view (with emphasis on the magnitude of the growing negativity bubble, the vulnerability of crude oil to an imminent price drop and a further discussion of a number of cr measures that imply less financial stress than equities are currently indicating) early next week, but for now, I believe that the skies are starting to clear after Mr. Market’s damaging hurricane, however, there is a lot of rebuilding left to be done on the ground."

  •  

     

  • xian (Premium)
    July 2nd, 2008 at 7:59 pm |      

    DM- NYX looks like NIKE of the exchange world in terms of market depth…i feel ur pain, but if (when) it does go back to 60, then i think that’s just a rest stop…going to b a long trip

     

  •      
     

    cramer has C at the top of his "dirty dozen list"- the untouchables he has zero confidence in…i agree w/ the divi cut

    1. Citigroup-  Here’s a company that is in so much trouble that I can’t even begin to figure out how to fix it. There was a moment that it could have been unwound, but now your best hope is that it goes to $5 or $6 and we realize it could fail and we let the Saudis bail it out. Don’t laugh — that’s the 1990 scenario. Pathetic that history repeats itself, but this is the worst-run major bank in the world. You get what you pay for. A dividend cut is next.

  •  

     

  • k1 (Premium)
    July 2nd, 2008 at 8:08 pm |       

    xian- I’ve also been struggling with the connection between oil futures prices and spot prices. In fact, the other day I posted a question about why we don’t see the price of the futures converge on some "real" level as expiration approaches. In a recent GaveKal newsletter, there was a comment on this subject I found useful. I’m posting the text here even though it’s a bit long, because the newsletters seem not to be publicly available:

    Question:  Warren Buffett recently said that the copious amounts of storage volume needed to warehouse oil precludes speculation from increasing prices? In other words, that speculators could impact the spot market only if they had access to large volumes of storage, and could remove physical product from the market. How do you reconcile your view with Buffet’s comment?

    Ahmad answers:  Actually, the cheapest way to story oil is by keeping it in the ground. And if prices for oil were only going to continue rising, then oil price producers would have little incentive to dig it up now and sell it at today’s prices when they could get more by waiting. …

    But to get more specifically to Buffett’s contention—oil speculators do not need to store oil. They need only store paper. The Brent and WTI futures are the benchmarks for the price of oil. Evervthing prices off the benchmark. The benchmarks were created by big oil and investment banks to provide a price discovery mechanism in a standardized and liquid market. Speculators, or “long-term investors”, are affecting the price level of the benchmark by the simple mechanics of bringing in a constant stream of demand for paper positions—and as we all know when demand is greater than supply the price goes up; as a result of that the spot market price goes up.

    To understand this process better—let us explain the different mechanics of the spot and futures markets.

    Futures are financial transactions. The nearest futures contract is called “the prompt”. Once the prompt is about to expire an investor can:

    • a) Roll his position into another futures contract
    • b) Exit his position altogether
    • c) Or exchange his position for a physical contract (EFP)

    The spot market is a physical market. To participate in this market you have to either:

    • a) Bring a very large tanker to the distributor and load it up with crude at a given date window, 
    • b) Or distribute oil from the same place at the given time.

    The spot gets its price from the reference benchmark which is the prompt futures, and trades at a differential to it (either a premium or a discount). The spot market can trade up to about two months ahead.

    Paper demand is not physical demand and thus is NOT “real demand”. The real demand will always be found in the spot crude changing hands every month. That’ is about 20 to 30 times less physical oil than paper demand in the prompt.

    Now what really matters here is not that 30 times more paper barrels are being traded than physical barrels. It is that those traded paper barrels have absolutely NO PHYSICAL requirement (hedging physical bets). It is a demand that far exceeds the “real demand” and is thus skewing price away from “real supply demand balances”. In effect demand is growing massively but supply is not.

  •      

     

    they always go for the soft-spots and apply pressure

    Bayou Co-Founder Sam Israel Gives Up After a Month on the Run

    July 2 (Bloomberg) — Samuel Israel, the hedge-fund firm founder convicted of directing a $400 million fraud at Bayou Group LLC, surrendered to authorities almost a month after he jumped bail to avoid a 20-year prison term.

    Israel, 48, arrived this morning to turn himself in riding a Yamaha motor-scooter, according to police in Southwick, Massachusetts, near the Connecticut border. The rural town is about 117 miles from where Israel disappeared in New York on June 9, the day he was to report to a federal prison northwest of Boston.

    “They arrested my girlfriend and I turned myself in,” Israel said this afternoon as he was led out of federal court in Springfield, Massachusetts. His girlfriend, Debra Ryan, was charged by federal prosecutors last month with helping him flee.

  •  

     

  • fredrang (Premium)
    July 2nd, 2008 at 9:06 pm |       

    Good post.   What we don’t know is the discount that is actually being paid on the spot market.  For example, when Valero was buying sour crude last quarter they were getting discounts of around $20 per barrel so they can use the futures price to gouge the consumer while the refiners and others that take physical delivery pay far less.  The refiners should be losing far more than they are given the reference price as gas would need to be over $5 to keep pace with the crude price we see every day. 

    I’ll venture to guess that less than 1% of our politicians have taken any time to learn how this works. 

    Thanks for the info.

    K1
  •      

    k1- that’s great info…thanks. it helps me get a clearer picture.

    i think it has to due w/ an expanded OI- not too sure on the particulars, but the idea i have is based on a what happens during a short squeeze in the futures markets:

    OI falls and prices rise b/c traders r closing out positions ("buy to close")

    what i expect to happen when oil cracks is prices falling as OI falls- institutions entering "sell to close" and liquidity dries up.

    the institutions r smart and they have to know that there’s a ton of air under them right now (the scalper/traders following the liquidity). 

    institutons tolerate it b/c the news flow backs the bullish premise and more fools get drawn in, so there’s no need to bail immediately- BUT as soon as it becomes clear that no one wants crude (ie inventory builds), then they’ll have to lighten up and enter the "sell to close" orders (maybe already doing so- i hope)

    side comment: my mom says she’s seeing a lot more people riding bicycle and walking around. she lives in an apartment building that’s near the center of downtown coral gables- a city w/in the city of miami.

    a nice area, lots of cafes, restaurants, outdoor/indoor dining, wide sidewalks w/ awnings, fully grown trees w/ shade (old city for s. florida), so walking/biking isnt too shabby- rather relaxing, id think.

    anyway. its a nice neighborhood and even they r feeling the gas pinch around there.

  •  

     

  • Phil
    July 2nd, 2008 at 10:00 pm |      

    Xian’s oil premise - OK, you are on the right track.  First of all, it is ridiculous to compare what the hunts did in a very small, non-electronic market 30 years ago to what is going on in oil today.   There were no silver derivatives, the way you jacked up the price of a commodity was to buy it and take it out of circulation - there wasn’t anything to "fake" because people who needed silver bought silver, not contracts for silver.  This is why Fortune’s arguement is too ridiculous for Masters to respond to, and the author attempts to use a lack of response as "proof" he is right - totally juvenile…

    So, getting past that, I posted the NYMEX rules here once but essentially they are "If you get to the end of an expiration period and you don’t want the barrels you have under contract, you can roll them to a later period at no charge."  What kind of crap is that?  Now obviously, if I paid $145 for oil and it keeps going down and down I need to take my loss at some point but, as long as I can generate and interest in the contract I bought for $80 last year, I can just roll and roll and roll and roll and roll and roll and roll and roll, month after month after month.  And all my rolled contracts show up as "open interest net long" and feed the myth that there is some tremendous demand, regardless of the facts.

    At this point, they’ve been rolling for so long they are getting careless and all full of themselves, just like speculators do at the top of any bubble.  Also, they may buy a few more contracts here and there and now they have themselves a much bigger position than they should but, as long as CNBC can keep herding the suckers in for them, they can wriggle out of the positions one by one until a bunch of retail schmucks are the only people holding the 1Bn+ barrels worth of contracts that are sitting on the NYMEX for $150Bn.  Then they can turn around and short them and make about $75Bn because no matter how badly you want to dump those 1Bn barrels, it is almost impossible to get more then 42Mb through Cushing in a month and arranging delivery to an alternate point is very prohibative.

    So, like any good squeeze, there is a bottleneck that stops people from selling.  You can buy an infinite amount of contracts but you can only liquidate 42M a month so oil can drop 10% and there would still be 958,000,0000 barrels to go after a month at $135, then 916,000,000 barrels at $120, then 870,000,000 at $105, then 828,000,000 at $90… and before you know it, those 1Bn barrels that were flipped for $150Bn will be changed into 750,000,000 barrels at $70 or $52Bn, wiping out about $80Bn from the bagholders.

    So, when you say "what will cause the institutions to reduce size" I’m saying they are already reducing their size.  GS doesn’t tell you oil is going to $200 because they want you to make a lot of money.  They are telling you oil is going to $200 because they bought a ton of it at $80 and they want to dump it on some sucker before Congress makes them report their holdings.  Congress just friggin’ told us GS and MS have been manipulating the markets only it’s not technically illegal at the moment.  Making it illegal is a very hard thing to do and the Republicans have been pulling out all the stops to keep it from happening and they ran it into the summer break without a resolution so it’s party time at the NYMEX as GS and MS shove the price of oil up our asses while they cover theirs. 

    I will also point out that STILL, a month after I first mentioned it, NO ONE has traded a SINGLE barrel of oil betwen Jan and Nov 2012, except June, SINCE OIL WAS $70 a barrel.  Where the hell is the legitimate hedging that magically doesn’t need oil for a year?  Think about it…  http://futures.tradingcharts.com/marketquotes/index.php3?market=CL

    Peter - Wow, is CNBC actually back on that kick?  Maybe we should point out to them that Hanna Montana gets paid 10,000 times more per hour than they do or that by weight, they are the stupidest "news" crew to ever clog the airwaves…  I guess by that logic we should be saving up for tap water, which is also a necessity and should obviously therefore cost $5 a gallon or maybe they should sell me some blood for $145 a barrel and I’ll open a blood bank because clearly all liquids should be the same price because they are liquids right?

    Nice find K1!

  •  

    Xian,
    Good ol’ Miracle Mile, great hang out place for locals.

  •  

     

  • xian (Premium)
    July 2nd, 2008 at 10:30 pm |     

    phil- im getting it…i think- thanks for the indepth response- still need to process it. u sound like the wine was delicious…LOL

    khan- my man, u know it- it’s livened up a ton in the last 10 yrs or so, lots of younger professional crowd. the coolest thing about that are is a small pub off of ponce de leon blvd. its totaly crap, but the underage drinking is always welcomed…has changed its name at least 3 times since ive known it ("crown & garter" "the english pub" and something else).

    what makes it so cool is that its literally 2 bs away from the gables police station…needless to say, i havent been there in a about 8 yrs.

     
  • Demetrius Michael (Premium)
    July 2nd, 2008 at 10:40 pm |      

    Oil will run out of gas soon.

  •  

     

  • Phil (Premium)
    July 2nd, 2008 at 10:44 pm |       

    Here’s a nice legislative update on what is attemping to be done by Congress (well, one side of it).

    I like the Shays bill but it has no teeth.

    This is a good list, coincidentally, the names of these Congresspeople often pop up in connection with the words "spoke in opposition to" pretty much any atempt to do something about the oil crisis.

    74% of Americans (even Republicans) reply either "very angry" or "somewhat angry" about the price of gas.  Every week Bush and co fail to act is another Congressional seat out the window…  Great survey in general.

    This is totally great, Fox has this thing where they dump news uned stuff from the field and sometimes you read really interesting things like this congressional feed and this internal Fox chatter:

    "The IE unit has been set up by the RNC to satisfy the the Byzantine rules of the US campaign finance rules which limit how much the party can spend in coordination with the McCain campaign to approximately 19 million dollars
    Just to be clear, the McCain campaign has no involvement with the ad campaign that is being undertaken by the RNC’s independent expenditure unit (or any other activity they may undertake). In fact, neither does the RNC itself.
    The Independent Expenditure Unit, as the name implies, is walled off from the RNC and the McCain campaign. The RNC hires a group of people to decide on what the ads should say and where they should run. They give them a checkbook and that is basically the end of their involvement.
    I know it all sounds vaguely ridiculous but it is perfectly legitimate and not really that unusual.
    This is not the entire story but this is as short a version I could come up with that made sense.
    Also, no I do not have the ad(s) yet. And no, I don’t think I will get them today. But as soon as I do, you will be the first to know."

     

  • Chesapeake calls hit 52-week high on Haynesville Shale news…

    www.interactivebrokers.com

    Today’s tickers: CHK, YHOO, VIX, QID, SNDK, ARM, HOV

    CHK- Chesapeake Energy Corp staged an aggressive 6.7% advance to $71.85 after announcing a joint venture in the Haynesville Shale area with Plains Exploration valued at $3 billion. The market has placed great store in any promising news out of the Haynesville Shale field, and recent activity reports have been bullish not just for Chesapeake share price action and call activity, but for other companies (such as PetroHawk) with a presence in the region. Today’s news pushed Chesapeake call volume to a new 52-week high before the noon hour – besting the record set back on June 19 and making Chesapeake one of our top-volume movers. Call volume at the July 70 and 75 calls showed traders looking to cash out of positions at the lower strike after the value of this position rose as much as 121% overnight, but the action in 75 calls consisted primarily of buyers, well in excess of open interest. A 20,000-lot long position at the July 55 put line was also conspicuous. Speculative call activity extended into the August contract with strikes 75, 80 and 85 all trading in excess of open interest.

    YHOO- Yahoo! Shares staged a 6% gain to $21.45 on a report appearing in the Wall Street Journal that Microsoft may look to rekindle its takeover bid, and that it may be looking to pursue a breakup of the company that would leave Microsoft to feast on Yahoo’s search operations while another media company would absorb the rest of the company. The Journal posed this scenario as a means of placating CEO Steve Ballmer’s thirst for growth in search operations, and activist shareholder Carl Icahn’s indignant demands for more value for Yahoo shareholders – both motives which would seem to sandwich Yahoo’s management and board between men of (an uncommonly allied) action. Implied volatility on all Yahoo options is showing a 67.5% reading against 51.6% historic volatility on Yahoo stock. With that disparity in mind, we observed what appeared to be a 61,000-lot straddle at the October 27.50 strike, which appeared to have sold to the bid at a combined premium of $7.29, the trader in this case availing himself of the buzz around Yahoo and attendant elevated implied volatility in hopes that time decay and anticlimactic share price action will do the rest of the work for him, eroding the value of the position (ideally to nothing, if Yahoo shares are trading at $27.50 exactly) so that it can be closed for a profit. Front-month call activity at the 25 strike traded to buyers and sellers at 29 cents per contract, denoting only about a 15% chance of Yahoo shares continuing their advance past the $25 mark over the next two weeks.

    VIX- Midday moves lower for major U.S. stocks followed dispiriting revelations from the ADP employment index, which showed the largest loss of private-sector jobs last month in almost six years. The grind lower in the S&P continued, sending index volatility as measured in the CBOE Volatility Index higher by 3.2% to 24.41. Many market observers have wondered with consternation over the absence of a substantial spike higher in the VIX that might help the market pin a timeline on a turnaround in the S&P, and it must be said that out-of-the-money VIX action predicting such a spike has been little help given that stocks are grinding lower, rather than out-and-out collapsing. That said, we can see that open interest in July VIX calls at strikes 25, 27.50 and 30 have all risen by 21% this week. Open interest at the 32.50 strike is up by nearly 25%. Today’s action, meanwhile, shows traders making two-way bets on the VIX in July calls at strikes of 25 to 30, with what may be call ladder action in the August contract at strikes 20, 25 and 30.

    QID- For a further read on the contrarian sentiment, we took a look at the option activity in the Ultrashort QQQ Proshares, a closed-end fund whose share price action and option positioning are inversely correlated to the Nasdaq index. Shares are 1.78% higher at $44.49, and with more than 38,000 active options it qualified ahead of the noon hour for our scan of top-50 movers based on volume. We registered interesting activity involving a 10,200-lot play at the in-the-money 41 call strike, where it appears that a trader sold the lots in July contract for $3.30 and bought them in August for $4.50. While this might be the rollover of an existing position from July into August – the volume here falls within the bounds of open interest in the July contract, but while most of the positions here accumulated on June 23, we could not match the volume here to a specific trade on that date. Or, the trader may be running a long calendar spread, selling the July 41 strike and buying the August 41 strike, expecting time decay to erode the value of the July call more quickly than the August position so that the position can be closed for a profit. It should be noted that even a short-term decline in the value of the QID might work to this trader’s advantage – at least in the short-term – by eroding the intrinsic value of the front-month call he has shorted.

    SNDK- Flash chip maker SanDisk recovered nearly 7% to $18.84 after ThinkPanmure analyst Vijay Rakesh issued a note forecasting possible price stabilization for NAND flash chips due to healthy demand from Apple. Bear in mind that just yesterday the company set a fresh 52-week low on speculation that it may be considering layoffs, and has withered under an almost unrelenting assault of negative analyst attention in recent weeks. In fact, Sandisk shares are down more than a third since June 1. Early option activity shows calls outmoving puts by more than 5 to 1 as implied volatility ticks in at a two-month high of 68.6%, and while the front month shows traders readily taking both sides of bullish bets by buying and selling calls at strikes 17.50 and 20, but a large, 11,500-lot position also traded to the middle of the market at the out-of-the-money October 25 strike. While a seller would be playing against a significant rise in Sandisk’s share price by autumn and taking in the 94-cent premium as a credit, a buyer might be reckoning on recovery for Sandisk to price levels it was last showing – interestingly enough – in early June.

    ARM - Despite an extraordinarily chancy outlook for U.S. automakers and their suppliers, Michigan-based ArvinMeritor, which makes steel wheels and axles for trucks and automobiles, guided higher-than-expected Q3 sales thanks to increased demand from military clients and buoyant international sales. Shares rose 5.4% to $13.01 and we registered an increase in option trading volume to 4 times the normal level. This appeared in heavy and fresh put volume at the November 15 strike, which traded for $3.60 per contract. Implied volatility at 78% stacks up to a historic reading of 61% on ArvinMeritor stock, which is about $4 off its 52-week low – still having traded as high as $23.25 over the past 52 weeks.

    HOV - Hovnanian - Shares are .36% higher at $5.66, but an increase in option trading volume to 2.5 times the normal level appeared in the November contract, where it looks like either a 2,000-lot long strangle or long collar was entered between the November 5 puts and 7.50 calls. An additional 2,000 lot trade at the January 5.00 put strike was bought on the offer for $1.30, suggesting a break below the 52-week low of $4.25 by November. Implied volatility on all Hovnanian options shows a 103% reading compared to 90% historic volatility recorded for Hovnanian stock.


    Which Way Wednesday?

    Without a lot of data to lead us this week the crude inventory report looms large today.

    We’ve noted that the Dow has been moving in perfect counter-step with the POO for quite some time, so we can expect a big move by the Dow today in whichever way oil doesn’t go.  If oil breaks $142.50, that is likely to send the markets down below those critical 20% levels and it will be time for us to cash and cover into the weekend.  Don’t forget the NYMEX criminals shorted the market 20M barrels of oil this month as they canceled 3,979,000,000 of the 4Bn barrels traded last month, leaving Cushing with less than 1/2 it’s usual supply of oil for July.

    This artificial shortage may cause a serious "draw" in inventories all month in July or it may simply offset the massive demand destruction noted by Mastercard as gasoline demand fell 2.1% last week, the 10th consecutive weekly decline measured.  Along with this, we have a clear picture of go forward demand destruction as truck sales have now dropped as much as 50% over last year.  Replacing just 1M 15 mpg truck with 30 mpg cars saves 15M barrels of gasoline and there are typically 8M trucks, vans and SUVs sold in a year so I’d guess we’ve knocked about 1M barrels a week off US consumption on that end already.

    Additionally, the FHA reports march had "the biggest-ever year-to-year drop in vehicle miles traveled on U.S. roads in a month: an estimated 4.3 percent, or 11 billion miles, below the March 2007 total of 258.3 billion."   4.3% - that’s a pretty big drop!  Over half of the 20Mbd the US consumes is gasoline so we are talking about 500,000 barrels a day less oil just based on the miles driven - no wonder the NYMEX crooks are shorting us 5Mb a week, if they don’t stop buying crude it’s going to pile up in the warehouse like police cars in the Blues Brothers movie.

    Those figures are from March, oil was "just" $110 a barrel in March and "only" $100 a barrel at the beginning of the month - I just can’t wait to see how those consumption figures look with oil up another 40%!  Of course CNBC and the energy bulls are hanging their hats on the IEA report, which somehow predicts demand will rise (get this!) 10% in the next 4 years, no matter what they charge for fuel AND they forecast that (no matter the price) that spare capacity will fall from the current 4Mbd (that’s right, the report says there is NOW 4Mbd of spare production) to less than 2Mbd by 2012.

    Oh well, what are you going to do?  Even OPEC’s Secretary General, Abdalla El-Badri is fed up as he snapped back at an interviewer this morning ""We do not prefer a high price. We’d like to see a comfortable price," El-Badri said. "If you need oil, we can sell it to you, but we don’t see any queue."

    At the rate we are losing jobs according to the latest ADP report, we’ll have another 45M people on unemployment by then so I’m really not sure who the IEA thinks is going to pay for all this $140 oil.  Of course 45M unemployed is a ridiculous extrapolation of a bad month but - that’s the way they forecast oil so why not everything else?

    Asia continued to fall along the line of a worst-case extrapolation with the Hang Seng dropping another 400 points (1.8%) and the Nikkei falling 176 points (1.3%), stopped only by the closing bell.  Auto and banking shares led the way down as even TM took a hit in yesterday’s auto sales report.  There are also huge currency concerns over tomorrow’s ECB meeting that may send the dollar off to new lows.

    Europe was doing very well this morning and is still (9am) up about a point but took a big turn down on the ADP numbers.  Big British retailer Marks & Spencer warned of a 5.3% drop in sales and homebuilder Taylor Wimpey said it was unable to raise capital and will be writing down $1.3Bn in properties, cutting jobs and suspending its dividend.  That bad new was negated by DB’s announcement that they DO NOT need any capital and will, in fact, make a profit this quarter.   UBS made a similar announcement yesterday and won’t it be funny if we get that kind of upside surprise from the US banks as well?  Denmark fell into technical recession and other EU nations are teetering.

    The US markets will do whatever they do until 10:30 and then we are off to the races so let’s be careful out there, it’s going to be a wild one!

     

     

     

     




     

    Phil's Favorites

    Fix the Money

    In the search for the root causes of the global financial crisis, Tim Iacono at The Mess That Greenspan Made, looks at the lack of sound money. 

    No, we need to fix the money. Literally. 

    Yes, there's a reason there are still so many Ron Paul for President signs up in peoples' front yards even though the Texas Republican long ago gave up his bid for t

    more from Ilene

    Trading Goddess



    more from Goddess

    The Options Report

    By Andrew Wilkinson and Rebecca Darst



    No end in sight as declines at European bourses replicate 1987 crash

    Today’s tickers: Today’s tickers: : VIX, RIO, C, XLF, STJ, SWY, EAT, PX & JBHT

    VIX – CBOE Volatility index. – Options volume is pretty heady in the fear gauge today, which stands at elevated crash-time readings. You have to look back on a monthly or weekly chart to see levels above a reading of 50. Today the VIX is 18% higher at 53.28, which has seen the call side of the options market most heavily traded today. It looks like some profit taking may have been behind the 35 call strike where 23,000 out of the 25,700 lots traded was sold at the bid. Open interest here of 74,142 contracts has been declining over the last week indicating some bright investor may have reached their goal. At the October 37.5, 50 and 55 strikes more buying was evident as investors clamored for protection higher up the ladder. It appea

    more from Andrew

    Stock and Option Trades
    (Advanced option strategies)

    Fuzzy Math!

    Have you ever seen literature from a fund posting attractive gains and comparing its performance to that of the benchmark S&P 500?  Have you ever investigated how the figures listed were calculated?  If not, you will definitely want to read on! Let's take a fairly representative example.  Fund Manager Joe Bull, for example, is very good at generating profits in bull markets.  Let's say Joe Bull made 20% in each of the years 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007.  But Joe Bull does not have the toolset to survive bear markets and finds in 2008 that he is down 30%.  What has Joe Bull's return been over 5 years? It turns out, the answer to that questions depends greatly on what Joe Bull wants to report as his return!  Why? Because little regulation exists to prevent Joe Bull from choosing any number of mathematical approaches to calculate his return! For example, fund manager Joe could simply take the average of his returns over 5 years.  This would be calculated as the sum of 2 more from Option Trades

    Option Sage
    (Strategy and Education)

    Trivia Time!

    Let's say you decide to deposit $100,000 into a brokerage account.  You decide you will check your portfolio on a weekly basis.  Now let's further assume that the first week has passed and you are about to log in to your account.  But before you do, you are told that one of two things has happened in the past week.

    [1]  Your portfolio went up $10,000 and then dropped $10,000

    [2]  Your portfolio went up 10% and then dropped 10%.

    So, the trivia question is:  In case [1], what should you expect your account value to be and is that the same figure as in case [2]?

    If you answered $100,000 in case [1], you would be absolutely correct!  If you answered that this is the same as in case [2] you would be absolutely incorrect!  Why?  Well let's take a look at what happens when the portfolio rises 10% first; it goes from $100,000 to $110,000.  But then we're told it drops 10%.  10% of $110,000 is $11,000 more from Option Sage

    October 2008
    M T W T F S S
    « Sep «-»  
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  

  • Categories


  • FeedTheBull - Top Stock market and Finance Sites

    Locations of visitors to this page


    0.77 seconds, 32 queries.