login | become a member

Archive for October 1st, 2008

Insurers options see rise in implied volatility

www.interactivebrokers.com

Today’s tickers: ALL, MET, VIX, BSX, GE, MYL, MAS, C, BAC, JPM, XLF, & SNDK

ALL – Allstate Corp. – Implied option volatility rose by around one-third on multi-line insurer Allstate today and reached 57.4% by lunchtime. This marks its highest reading by far in the last 12 months despite a relatively orderly share price slip from $59 to $43.12 in that time frame. Option traders forced put prices higher by leaning on puts across the strip, which resulted in close to five times as many puts in play as calls. The January contract saw volume equal to around one half of its current open interest as investors sought protection against potential share price erosion beneath the 42.50 strike. The premium rose by 40% to 4.0 per contract implying a break even share price at $38.50 at expiration.

MET – Metlife Inc. – Demand for insurance against the insurer saw implied volatility on Metlife options rise 43% to 110% by lunchtime. That compares to a 70% reading on the volatility of the share price, which today has fallen 12.5% to $49.05. Activity in the option series was less pronounced than in Allstate, but notable was that demand for protection from a declining share price was taken in the October contract at strikes as low as $20.00. In fact at strikes from 20 through 35 today’s volume is clearly fresh judging by the fact that it is in excess of existing open interest. In recent days shares in this company hit a fresh 52-week low falling through $45.00.

VIX – CBOE Volatility Index – The bias towards call buying is apparent in the November contract where call volume (indicating confidence in sustained volatility) of 12,000 lots leaves lagging put volume of just about 1,000 lots. In the October contract calls at the 30 and 35 lines are most popular. The October VIX future is trading at 31.65 compared to the official spot index, which at 41.37 is 5% higher than Tuesday. With call activity in the 30-plus strikes, the clear message is that investors are now focusing less on when the bailout package will pass. Instead they are more concerned with the contractionary economic data emerging around the globe and perhaps rethinking the prospect for an early stock market recovery. Fresh buying at the 40 strike call in December tells us that these investors don’t see market volatility softening throughout the fourth quarter.

BSX – Boston Scientific – With its shares already heading towards the $10.76 52-week low, shares in Boston Scientific have lost 7.5% today at $11.35 following an order by a judge made yesterday with a final settlement package leaving the medical device maker on the wrong end of payment of $703 million to Johnson & Johnson. The company claimed patent infringement on a bare metal stent. Option traders seized the opportunity to purchase put options in the November contract at the 10 strike for fear that in light of declining sales and a large debt burden the company might face a single digit share price before long. Investors paid 45 cents for some 12,100 puts on this stock while in the January ’09 and 2015 contracts they also appeared to rush for further downside protection at the same strike. Today’s option volume is close to four times the regular level according to our market scanner.

GE– General Electric. - The earlier 2-plus reading on the put/call ratio for options traded on GE has subsequently diluted, but the same relief can’t be found for the share price, which currently has an 8.8% loss at $23.40. A stark analyst warning over the economic climate has impacted investor sentiment today. Notable option activity occurred earlier as low as the 10 strike and activity at this and the nearby 12.5 strike represent around half of the current open interest investors hold. In that sense there is a rising groundswell of opinion – or at least enough worried investors – that believe that GE is hardly immune from suffering a similar fate to any banking entity. The October 17.5 strike is most popular today with some 12,500 lots in play at a current premium of 67 cents, which is elevated from yesterday’s 8 cent premium.

MYL – Mylan Inc.– Two weeks ago the company received FDA approval for an anti-psychotic drug. Today we see fresh news to buoy the stock, which is trading unchanged at $11.42. However, it’s a haven for bullish option plays this morning as some 18,800 contracts ensures that it appears on our “most active” market scanners. The typical daily options volume is a mere 2,800 contracts. The destination for call buyers today is at the October and November 12.50 strikes inferring a 9.5% pre-expiration rally for the stock whose 52-week low was established prior to the recent FDA seal of approval. Implied option volatility has largely been above 60% since then and today’s 67% reading stacks up against a 55% level on the share price.

MAS – Masco Corp. – Wood product and building material manufacturer, Masco, is lower today by 2% at $17.57, while options activity indicates a more bullish perspective. Today’s activity is seen in the October 20 calls, which have traded 5,700 times at a premium of 35 cents and higher by 17% on yesterday’s value. The company recently moved to increase its dividend but that probably has little bearing on today’s trade. This smacks of an outright bull looking for a build on what could be a double-bottom in the charts.

C – Citigroup – has a 75 gain in its shares to $21.95 while option activity delivers a mixed bag of goodies. The October 22.5 call option saw healthy volume of 16,400 contracts trading evenly between buyers and sellers. The lower 20 and 17.5 strike puts largely traded on the offer this morning indicating some distrust in the rally. The overall 155,000 lot volume today maintains Citi’s position among our most actively traded contracts today. Implied volatility is off its recent triple-digit value at 82.5%.

BAC – Bank of America – Option activity of 70,000 lots makes BoA our fifth most actively traded equity series by noon. A 5% gain for its shares to $36.75 is accompanied by decent buying activity in the November 35 through 40 strikes.

JPM – JPMorgan Chase - Some 50,000 option contracts are in play today as JPM is 2.5% higher at $47.85. Unlike the clarity on positioning in BAC, it appears that there is also distrust from option traders on the strengthof this rally. We note from time and sales data that the October at the money calls were largely sold while the same month 40 puts were in decent demand.

XLF – Financial Select Sector SPDR – Despite a poor showing for the broad market, financial shares are 1% to the better. Action in the XLF still shows more healthy demand for put options on the rally. The October 17 and 19 strikes – with the share price reading $20.11 – have both traded on volume in excess of 32,000 lots. Premiums paid are 44cents and $1.01 at the 19 line.

SNDK – Sandisk Corp – Heavy options volume has shown up in this memory device maker this morning. It would appear that a large spread order has gone through in the January contract involving around 20,000 lots at each of the 17.5 and 22.5 strikes. The trade with a net premium of 2.15 traded to the middle of the market and so masks the investor’s objectives here. The strikes wrap around the current share price of $19.61 and could be a bullish call spread, in which the investor gets long the stock via the lower strike but reduces the premium by taking in that at the higher strike. The maximum profit of the distance between the strikes minus the net premium would yield a gain of 2.85 per contract at a share price of $22.50 at expiration. Given today’s rally in shares of Sandisk this is the most likely positioning.


Which Way Wednesday - Hedging for Disaster?

They are messing with the bailout again.

Now the Republicans in Congress are crafting an "alternate" plan that includes a provision to eliminate capital gains for 2 years and provides massive business tax refunds.  Talk about an earmark!  Now I am outraged and demanding my representative vote this down.  Effectively, what this means is that, now that the value of our homes is at a 5-year low and loan portfolios are being written down 50%, the people who come in and buy them at fire-sale prices can do so, double up in 2 years and pay no taxes.  Talk about a land grab for the rich!

At the same time, some House members have signaled they are against allowing changes in mark to market accounting rules that will allow the banks to carry distressed assets long-term, rather than being forced to liquidate them at fire-sale prices.  Does anyone see a pattern here?  No wonder David Fry asks in his S&P chart: "Where are the adults?"

This statement from Congressman David Davis, who co-sponsored the alternate bill, gives you a pretty good idea of how far apart these new provisions are from what was originally proposed.  Davis says of the oirginal bill: "Make no mistake about it, this legislation provides a taxpayer financed bailout of those who have acted irresponsibly. It federalizes and socializes another sector of our economy, fundamentally changing yet again the federal government’s role in the private economy. And, most importantly, this bill does nothing to address the problems that led to this financial crisis in the first place."  Interestingly, while he decries bailing out those who act irresponsibly, a cornerstone of his bill is to "Allow companies to carry-back losses arising in tax years ending in 2007, 2008, or 2009 back 5 years, generating a tax refund and immediate capital."  So WALL STREET firms can ask for hundreds of Billions of dollars in taxes back against the write-downs they are taking now in their portfolios!  Madness!!!

The House and Senate also added earmarks for alternative energy credits to the bailout package but there is some logic to that as the impasse of this week has threatened the extension of existing energy credits that are set to expire in three months.  This has been tanking the solar sector and boosting oil in recent trading and is actually an important piece of legislation that the House needed to get done.  "With hundreds of thousands of American jobs and billions of dollars in clean energy investment at risk, we urge congressional leaders not to leave for the election recess" until reaching an agreement, the CEOs of national hydropower, geothermal, solar and wind energy associations said in a statement.

The Senate "rescue plan," which is being voted on tonight, would cost more than $100 billion and extend and expand many individual and business tax breaks, including tax credits for the production and use of renewable energy sources, like solar energy and wind power. The bill would also extend the business tax credit for research and development, expand the child tax credit, protect millions of families from the alternative minimum tax, and provide tax relief to victims of recent floods, tornadoes and severe storms.  Sounds good but who’s going to pay for it (more deficit?) and all these major changes make me very nervous that the whole thing may blow up and not get passed.

We know about using the SKFs to cover for a financial meltdown, with that ETF back down at $100, it’s a good opportunity to use Jan $100s at $19 for cover as they should retain about 1/2 of their value even if things go great for the financials but, if we drop back to just where we were on Monday, they are 100% in the money and will have very expensive October calls to sell against. 

Another crisis ETF is DXD, an ultra-short on the Dow.  Despite the Dow "only" gaining 485 points yesterday, the DXD plunged back to Monday’s open at $61.53, after closing at just under 67 on Monday.  If the economy breaks, Warren Buffett has said we will be looking at the 9,000s on the Dow, close to $80 on the DXD so Apr $55s at $14.20 are not a bad protector, especially as you can already sell Oct $69s for $2.90.  These are, of course, cover plays that you would hope to lose as they are playing for a disaster in the markets but, if you want to take a chance on being uncovered on longs in hopes of a bailout, it does make sense to take out some insurance against a worst-case scenario.  If we rally, the Dow has a declining 50 dma at 11,339 that should offer resistance and that would be a good time to get out (unless we feel the rally is irrational) of the protective plays but that line has held VERY firm since we broke below it in June.

SDS is the ultra-short ETF on the S&P and that one was at $77+ twice this month but retraced to $70.30 at yesterday’s close.  The March $77s are back to $9.95 and they were selling for $13 yesterday morning.  Even better, the current $77s can be sold for $4.05 which is a $3 spread against a market melt-down so perhaps a 4:3 spread is a pretty cheap way to add some protection. 

As far as hedging goes, if you are 50% invested and 50% in cash and you are worried about losing 20% on the stock side in a major sell-off, then the logic of these hedges is to take 40% of your cash (20% of your total) and put it on something that may double while the other positions lose.  If things go down, your gains on the hedge offset some of the losses on your longer positions.  If things go up, you can stop out with a 25% loss, which will "only" be a 5% hit on your total portfolio but it means we are breaking through resistance and your upside bets are safe and doing well.  That is not a bad trade-off for insurance in this crazy market.  Also, be aware that these are thinly traded contracts with wide bid/ask spreads and you need to use caution establishing and exiting positions - note the way GOOG was wildly traded into yesterday’s close, flushing out stops on both sides of the trade (the Nasdaq canceled many of the trades, calling them "erroneous")..

We’ll be looking to hold test levels today that were breakout levels yesterday: 10,650 on the Dow, 7,400 on the NYSE and 1,135 on the S&P.  IF we do hang on and head back up, the Russell was a laggard yesterday but still the clear leader in last night’s Big Chart review and we need them to retake 700, with 720 being the rally point we need over the 50 dma, which was looking so promising just a week ago.   Coming down from the 750s to 679 (was below 660 on Monday) in just 6 trading sessions makes the Oct %730s, now at $6.20 a pretty nice gamble on the bailout actually doing some good for the markets, as those contracts were trading at $40 on the 19th and over $10 all of last week.

[Tankan]Asian markets were mainly closed for the holidays with China closed through Monday so there is little to be gleaned from thin action over there.  The Nikkei was open and added 108 points but pulled off that trick while trading down all day after getting a big pop at the open, so let’s not do a victory dance over that number.  The BOJ’s Business Confidence Survey hit a 5-year low, negative for the first time since June, 2003.  Companies grew more pessimistic about nearly all aspects of their business. They are feeling the pinch from soaring prices of energy and raw materials, while being forced to lower the outlook for consumer demand in Japan and abroad.  This survey was completed by many companies BEFORE the US crisis hit the fan and already "Many companies also report funding conditions are severe, in part reflecting credit tightening by banks. The main tankan confidence index for small- and medium-sized companies showed a negative reading of 21, compared with minus 16 in June."

Global funding costs are spiraling out of control and are only held in check at the moment on the promise of the bailout being passed this week.  Although Asian and European governments are flooding the market with liquidity at unprecedented levels, funding costs are continuing to rise as interbank lending rates skyrocket (because banks don’t trust each others books enough to hand out loans to each other).  "A lot of companies are saying, ’should I even consider continuing with my current projects?‘" said Dr. Subramanian, head of investment banking at Enam Securities in Mumbai. He said power companies in India used to pay 8% for debt that now costs 14% to 15%, while raising money through equity is even more costly.  India’s central bank reassured depositors Tuesday about the health of IBN (who we made a well-timed play on Tuesday morning) following rumors of some financial distress and reports of cash withdrawals.

[Battered Banks]Europe is mixed an hour ahead of the US open, with the FTSE up 1.5%, the CAC flat and the Dax down 0.7% as overnight LIBOR rates shot up to 6.88% (they were in "crisis" on Monday when they touched 4%) and now the 3-month dollar LIBOR has hit 4.05%.  The dollar continued to climb against the Euro, keeping a lid on gold and oil despite upward inflation pressure on a global scale as Central Banks literally flood their countries with currency.  In France, President Nicolas Sarkozy met Tuesday with heads of the country’s financial institutions to assess their ability to borrow money, and promised measures by the end of the week to ensure they can carry out what the president’s office called their "primary task of financing the economy."

We talked about Ireland’s extreme measures in yesterday’s morning post and the ECB dropped another $50Bn into overnight funds and received bids for $70Bn right away so another case of possibly too little, too late.  The BOE filled all $13.4Bn worth of overnight bids for $30Bn worth of capital set to mature on October 7th.  The Swiss National bank said it also maintained its overnight offering of dollars "in a generous and flexible manner," without providing further details.  "Central banks can address the problem of liquidity, but they cannot address the problem of solvency and trust among banks," said UBS economist Stephane Deo.

One or more financial institutions parked a staggering €102.81 billion ($144.72 billion) overnight in the ECB’s deposit facility, which pays a low rate of 3.25%, data from the central bank showed Wednesday. The significance is that European banks would rather park funds at the central bank at a lower rate than lend to other banks at a higher rate.

Credit is so tight in the US that LVS CEO, Shelly Adelson, had to lend $475M to his own company in order for LVS to avoid breaking the terms of a $5Bn credit facility.  Investors and analysts had speculated for weeks over how the gambling company — best known for the Venice-themed Venetian resort in Las Vegas — would navigate a cash-flow shortage that would have put it out of compliance with its loan terms, and in the difficult position of renegotiating with lenders as Wall Street continues to be consumed by turmoil.  Meanwhile, GGP (another company big on property development) is down 73% on concerns that that company may not be able to service their $27Bn in debt.

These are the consequences being faced after just 2 days’ "delay" of signing the bailout package.  Congress  many think Paulson and Bernanke and Warren Buffett are kidding when they say we are about to go over an economic cliff but I think there is certainly enough evidence to merit serious concern.  In part, we have a crisis of confidence and - even if it were true that we could "muddle through" without a bailout, if just 1/3 of the investors believe that we can’t and pull out of the markets, what good will it do the remaining optimists?

Needless to say, be very careful out there!

 




 

Phil's Favorites

Dave's Daily

MARKET COMMENT

November 19, 2008, courtesy of Dave Fry at ETF Digest. 

 

Another Big Wednesday? Oh yeah! Of course what Laird Hamilton is doing in this video is an awesome ride of guts but ultimately beautiful at the same time. We can’t say the same thing about the stock market now can we?

more from Ilene

Trading Goddess

Post Comments

...

more from Goddess

The Options Report

By Andrew Wilkinson and Rebecca Darst



JPMorgan decline sets off bullish option bets for 2009

Today’s tickers: JPM, BBY, ACE, IRM, SHLD & CSCO

JPM – JP Morgan Chase & Co. – With the market in meltdown mode, investors are once again departing all shades of financial shares. There are new lows today at several major financial institutions including blue-blooded JP Morgan. The 52-week $28.87 low is a radical shift from the $50.50 52-week peak set three days into October. We’re not sure many financial companies can claim to have traded annual peaks and lows in such a short space of time, but this underscores the negative outlook for the economy and companies regardless of shade. Options on JPM are in play today with large buying of this week’s expiring 30 strike puts at 1.40 premium. Today’s investor interest at that strike is equal to the outstanding number of puts at the strike and shows h

more from Andrew

Stock and Option Trades
(Advanced option strategies)

Fuzzy Math!

Have you ever seen literature from a fund posting attractive gains and comparing its performance to that of the benchmark S&P 500?  Have you ever investigated how the figures listed were calculated?  If not, you will definitely want to read on! Let's take a fairly representative example.  Fund Manager Joe Bull, for example, is very good at generating profits in bull markets.  Let's say Joe Bull made 20% in each of the years 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007.  But Joe Bull does not have the toolset to survive bear markets and finds in 2008 that he is down 30%.  What has Joe Bull's return been over 5 years? It turns out, the answer to that questions depends greatly on what Joe Bull wants to report as his return!  Why? Because little regulation exists to prevent Joe Bull from choosing any number of mathematical approaches to calculate his return! For example, fund manager Joe could simply take the average of his returns over 5 years.  This would be calculated as the sum of 2 more from Option Trades

Option Sage
(Strategy and Education)

Trivia Time!

Let's say you decide to deposit $100,000 into a brokerage account.  You decide you will check your portfolio on a weekly basis.  Now let's further assume that the first week has passed and you are about to log in to your account.  But before you do, you are told that one of two things has happened in the past week.

[1]  Your portfolio went up $10,000 and then dropped $10,000

[2]  Your portfolio went up 10% and then dropped 10%.

So, the trivia question is:  In case [1], what should you expect your account value to be and is that the same figure as in case [2]?

If you answered $100,000 in case [1], you would be absolutely correct!  If you answered that this is the same as in case [2] you would be absolutely incorrect!  Why?  Well let's take a look at what happens when the portfolio rises 10% first; it goes from $100,000 to $110,000.  But then we're told it drops 10%.  10% of $110,000 is $11,000 more from Option Sage


0.50 seconds, 32 queries.