Dual-Class Share Structures Have Outstayed Their Welcome

0
9

By Insightia. Originally published at ValueWalk.

dual-class share structure dividend capture strategy Securities servicers Yield-Starved Stock Investing Logica Capital Nationwide Building Society interest rates Integrated Model Livermore investment Relief Rally WCM Investment Management Vltava Fund Commodities investor Volksbank Hedge Fund Booster. Stock Investing Investment Portfolio Commodities Hedge Funds Fortescue Metals Group commodity-focused hedge funds Sustainable investing US Rate Hike Lowell Capital

More investors evidently believe dual-class share structures have outstayed their welcome, with so-called “recapitalization” proposals for their elimination winning record levels of support this year.

As of June 8, 2022, the five shareholder proposals calling on U.S.-listed companies to recapitalize for all stock to adopt a one-vote-per-share policy have won an average of 29.5% support, compared to 27.5% and 28.9% support throughout 2020 and 2021, respectively.


Q1 2022 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

NorthStar Asset Management’s proposal asking Alphabet Inc (NASDAQ:GOOGL) to collapse its dual-class structure won 33.2% support at the company’s June 1 annual meeting, the highest level of support such a proposal has ever won in its 11 years on the tech giant’s ballot.

It was much the same story at Meta Platforms Inc (NASDAQ:META)’s May 25 annual meeting, where a recapitalization proposal won 28.1% support, the highest level of support in its ninth year on the ballot.

The results themselves could bolster claims that their dual-class voting structures excessively strengthen their founders’ voting power at the expense of shareholders. If the vote had been conducted on a one-share-one-vote basis, the latest recapitalization proposals at Alphabet and Meta would have won 98.2% and 94.8% support, respectively.

John Chevedden similarly told me that his proposal urging Ford Motor Company (NYSE:F) to recapitalize has experienced a surge in support this year, the 36.8% support it won equating to 82.7% of independent votes cast.

Dual-Class Share Structure Is Sticking Out Like A Sore Thumb

It is unsurprising that recapitalization proposals continue to win mounting support. Companies with dual-class share structures are starting to stick out like a sore thumb, even in the U.S. where regulators are more accepting of such controversial share structures.

Companies with dual-class share structures make up only 7% of the S&P 500 and 11.9% of the Russell 3000 according to Insightia’s Governance module.

BlackRock voted in favor of proposals seeking recapitalization at both Alphabet and Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) in 2021, noting in a voting bulletin that the fund manager “strongly prefer[s] a one vote for one share structure” as it “provides control proportionate to shareholders’ capital at risk.”

Proxy adviser voting policies relating to multi-class share structures are also becoming stricter as sunset provisions, which set a time limit by which issuers should phase out their multi-class share structure in favor of a one-vote-per-share structure, have become best practice.

Glass Lewis and Institutional Shareholder Services updated their policies concerning dual-listed companies a few weeks apart in late 2021. Starting this year, both advisers recommend voting against the chair of the governance committee and the entire board respectively at companies with dual-class share structures that fail to provide a “reasonable” sunset provision.

“A growing proportion of companies that make their debut on U.S. exchanges with dual-class share structures are incorporating reasonable time-based sunset provisions,” Amy Borrus, executive director at the Council of Institutional Investors, told Insightia in an interview. “It is a great step forward that sunset provisions are gaining acceptance.”

Rebecca Sherratt, Publications Editor, Insightia

Updated on

Sign up for ValueWalk’s free newsletter here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments