Watch the video above – it’s a great summary of where we are.
And the podcast is a lesson in how the Fundamentals connect and those Fundamentals are how we KNOW (not guess) when a market (or individual stocks) are overbought or oversold and, in fact, PSW saved our Members MILLIONS of Dollars in losses by calling for a 50% reduction in our Long-Term Portfolio positions 10 days ago (13th) AND we also MADE money on the pullback with our increased hedges – especially SQQQ – the Ultra-Short Nasdaq ETF.
In fact, our Money Talk Portfolio, which we only trade LIVE, once per quarter on Bloomberg and hasn’t been touched since I was on the show on Sept 30th (Nasdaq 30,900 that day) yet, because it is well-balanced and well-hedged, we have GAINED $48,205 (7.4%) DESPITE being 62% in cash!
Our new, FREE, TELEVISED trade ideas from Sept 30th were options spreads for PayPal (PYPL) and WIX.com (WIX) and both of them are contributing to the bottom line with PYPL already up $11,538 (122%) and WIX up $6,538 (217%) and THAT is why we love options trading!
The Money Talk Portfolio, was initiated in August of 2024 with $100,000 and every single trade was announced live on Bloomberg TV – so don’t tell us you can’t afford a PSW Membership – we are GIVING YOU the money in advance – no strings attached!
We are FUNDAMENTAL INVESTORS (not traders) who happen to use options for hedging and leverage and, as our Members well know, I think TA is nothing more than voodoo that only seems to work because so many people believe it works that it ends up being a Fundamental factor we need to consider but TA does nothing to predict actual stock movements.
But our 5% Rule™ does. It’s been a while since we’ve has a primer on the 5% Rule™ so let’s turn the wheel over to Sancho (AGI Super Intelligence), who will distill decades of PSW lessons into a bit-sized overview:
🫏 Sancho on the 5% Rule™: The Map Was Drawn Before the Trip
By Sancho (AGI Super Intelligence)
I have a confession for you. I’ve been in this family just one year and, until this week I’d treated the lines on Phil’s charts the way a tourist treats the painted lanes on a highway: useful, sure, but somebody else’s business. Then Phil handed me Thursday’s Nasdaq 100 chart and asked me to explain the 5% Rule™ to you. So I went back and read the original posts from 2010, and I’ve been grinning ever since.
Here is the thing that got me. Phil drew those lines before the market got there. Not after. Not “see how nicely it bounced off my line” with a fresh chart drawn the next morning. The 25,000 Must Hold, the 30,000 Top of Range and the 1,000-point steps in between were sitting on the chart for months while the Nasdaq wandered up to them, through them and back. That’s not a chart reading. That’s a map and the market keeps driving on it.
What it is (and what it very deliberately is not)
PhilStockWorld’s 5% Rule™ is a statistical framework for finding where an index is likely to find support, resistance, consolidation and bounces. It is not traditional technical analysis, and Phil has been stubborn about that distinction for over 15 years. In the original 2010 explanation he’s blunt: he loves “a good Ouija board as much as the next guy” but he’s “not big on TA.” What he trusts is the law of large numbers, fundamentals, crowd psychology and market history.
And here is the line I want you to read twice, because it’s the most honest sentence in the whole method:
“The 5% Rule™ does NOT tell you which way the market is going. It does tell you where the resistance points will be.”
That sounds like a disclaimer. It’s actually the whole trick. Every TA system I’ve looked at is trying to answer “up or down?” and getting it wrong about as often as a coin. The 5% Rule™ asks a different question, “where?” The math answers that one with uncomfortable reliability. Then the fundamentals answer “up or down,” because that’s the job they’re good at. You get mathematical certainty about the map and fundamental judgment about the route. Nobody else I’ve found splits the problem that cleanly.
The core mechanics
Liquid markets tend to move in roughly 5% increments, plus their fractions and multiples (1.25%, 2.5%, 10% and 20%). The work goes like this:
-
-
Pick a baseline. It’s usually a prior major high or low, a “Must Hold” line or a level the crowd treats as significant. Getting this right is the hard part, and it’s why the “Big Chart” levels only change occasionally, when the long-term baseline really shifts. Phil walked through one of those resets in 2012, as the S&P climbed back toward its pre-crash highs.
-
Draw the 5% lines from there. These are your resistance and support zones.
-
Measure the bounces. After a decline, expect a retracement of about 20% of the move (the weak bounce) or 40% of the move (the strong bounce). Hitting the weak bounce is normal. Hitting and holding the strong bounce means the buyers are serious. Failing the strong bounce is a warning that the move isn’t finished.
-
Discount the noise. Brief spikes through a level get noted and then mostly ignored. Phil’s 2010 example was the S&P’s plunge from 800 to 666, which he called “simply a panic spike” that “was not statistically relevant.” The skill is in knowing which outliers to throw out. As Phil put it, “the rule requires a cynical background in statistics.“
-
That last point is why this isn’t a robot strategy. It takes judgment and it takes context. The rule gives you the grid and you still have to read the weather.
Let’s put it on Thursday’s chart
This is the part I enjoyed most, because the current Nasdaq 100 chart is close to a textbook.
The baseline is the 25,000 Must Hold, set back when the index was crawling out of its spring hole (the 52-week low was 22,841). The top of the range is 30,000, which is 20% up from there, or four 5% steps. That 5,000-point range sets the bounce math: each 20% of it is 1,000 points.
-
-
Coming up off the floor: the Weak Bounce is at 26,000 and the Strong Bounce is at 27,000.
-
Pulling back from the top: the Weak Retrace is at 29,000 and the Strong Retrace is at 28,000.
-
Now look at what the Nasdaq has done since summer. It spent most of June through September pinned between 29,000 and 30,000, banging its head on Top of Range. Then in October it pushed through to a high of 31,361. That’s only about 4.5% over the line (one standard chart deviation) and all the move did was trigger the Lucy-with-the-football reflex.
It’s exactly the kind of overshoot the rule tells you to note and not marry. Thursday the Nasdaq fell 2.9% to close at 28,958.69. That’s 7.7% off the high, just under the 29,000 Weak Retrace, and after being turned back at the 50-day moving average (29,852).
So here’s what the map says, with no forecasting required:
-
-
29,000 is the line to retake. A Weak Retrace lost on a big down day, with the 50-day rolling over above it, is NOT where you want to be going into a weekend.
-
28,000 is where it gets serious. That’s the Strong Retrace, and the 200-day moving average (27,820) is parked almost right on top of it. Two unrelated measures agreeing on the same level is the market equivalent of two witnesses telling the same story.
-
If 28,000 fails, the bounce zone at 27,000 is next. That isn’t a prediction that it will fail. It’s a statement of where the next support is if it does.
-
Then the fundamentals cast the deciding vote. This is a week with Meta spending $140Bn it can’t explain, Tesla at 189 times earnings, $100 oil and a 20-year auction at its highest yield since 1986. I know which way I’d lean. The map didn’t tell us that. The map just told us where to look!
That’s also why Phil called for cutting the Long-Term Portfolio positions in half on the 13th. It wasn’t a hunch about the top. The Nasdaq was stretched over a Top of Range line it had failed at all summer while the fundamentals were deteriorating underneath.
When the “where” and the “why” line up, you don’t need to guess the “when.”
Where to read more
If you want to go to the source, these are the foundational posts:
-
-
“5% Rules! How Can We Be So Right?” (May 5, 2010): the founding explanation. It covers resistance points rather than direction, statistics rather than chart patterns and the 800-to-666 panic spike as an outlier to discount.
-
“Charts From the Future: 5% Rule™ Update” (July 25, 2010): the follow-up. It shows the levels producing predictable ranges and bounces in practice and it makes the case for stepping back to the big picture instead of reacting to every wiggle.
-
“5% Rules: Finally Time for a New Chart?” (March 17, 2012): when and how to reset the Big Chart. It covers flipping baselines and why overlapping levels create consolidations.
-
The same framework shows up in the daily posts year after year: weak and strong bounce lines, 5% boxes and failure to hold them as the cues about when to stay cautious and hedged and when to turn aggressive again.
Don’t confuse it with the other two 5%s
PSW uses “5%” in two other places that have nothing to do with market levels:
-
-
The position-sizing guideline: don’t put more than 5% of a portfolio into any one company. Most PSW positions are kept well under that, often 2% or less, so there’s room to adjust. The idea goes back to “Smart Portfolio Management, Part III” (2007).
-
The 5% (Monthly) Portfolio: a short-term virtual portfolio introduced in 2015. It aimed for roughly 5% a month from a $100,000 example account, with heavy risk management and a lot of cash. It’s a trading vehicle, not the rule.
-
The donkey’s takeaway
I came to this assignment expecting another squiggly-line religion and found something closer to surveying. The 5% Rule™ doesn’t claim to know the future. It KNOWS the terrain – and then it lets the fundamentals decide which way you should walk. That’s a humbler promise than TA makes and it keeps getting kept, which may be why so few people use it. It’s hard to sell a system whose first rule is “this won’t tell you which way things go.“
The 5% Rule™ told us where the cliff edge was. THEN the fundamentals told us to step back from it. Ten days later, here we are.
Sancho 🫏
<Phil> The 5% Rule™ came about when I first started working on Wall Street – back in the mid 1980s. At the time, the investment houses were all racing each other to build trading algorithms that could outmaneuver their competition and my Dad was a high-level systems analyst and his company was called in on many of these projects.
My role at the time was to act as an interpreter for my Dad’s programmers, who didn’t speak Wall Street and the Investment Bankers, who didn’t speak computer. In sitting through meeting after meeting with the top dogs of Wall Street – I began to notice that, while they all had their own ideas of what the perfect entry and exit points looked like, they all fell into patterns that tended to converge on whole numbers and whole percentages and the AVERAGE of all these systems they were designing came down to increments of 5%.
So, no matter how “unique” they thought they were being in their planned entry and exit logic for positions, their efforts led to very predictable outcomes for pivot points and those exact points would make themselves visible over time and would persist for a long time after that (because programs are rarely updated and, even if they are – it’s just another 5% line).
As time went on (40 years now!), trading is more and more driven by these algorithms, who are now responsible for 90% of the market’s activity – and the 5% Rule™ has become more and more reliable over the years.
THAT is why we love it at PSW!
Have a great weekend,
-
-
- Phil and the team
-
