HFT “Flash” Orders: Nasdaq Admission?
by ilene - July 29th, 2009 10:58 am
HFT "Flash" Orders: Nasdaq Admission?
Courtesy of Karl Denninger at The Market Ticker
A Nasdaq spokeswoman said the exchange had no comment beyond a letter Greifeld sent to the SEC on Monday, in which he called for the elimination of "any order types or market structure policies that do not contribute to public price formation and market transparency."
Greifeld’s letter listed "flash orders, internalized orders, enhanced liquidity providers, Block Talk orders, and dark pools," as order types that do not support price formation.
But wait….
The New York Democrat, who has urged the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to clamp down on the practice, said parent company Nasdaq OMX is willing to submit to a potential ban by the agency after it "reluctantly" started offering flashes early last month.
Did I just read that correctly? Did Nasdaq OMX tell Chuck Schumer that it intentionally (even if reluctantly) began offering order types that do not contribute to public price formation and market transparency?
That is, did they (perhaps unwittingly) just admit to the true purpose of these order types and their willing participation in same rather than doing what any good steward of a public trust should have done – that is, standing up immediately as soon as this chicanery began and raising hell?
Oh wait – maybe they did:
Nasdaq and rival BATS Exchange started on June 3 "flashing" buy and sell orders to exchange members, including big banks and hedge funds — closely mirroring a service offered by alternative venue Direct Edge, which long offered the service to a smaller group of market participants, and was growing its market share at the exchanges’ expense.
Ah. So now we’re getting to the bottom of this, aren’t we?
See, there are people who like a two-tiered market; broadly they are those institutional traders who really don’t want their interest (to buy or sell) to be made public lest the price move, and then there are those traders who love the idea of being able to get a "look first" sort of view of what’s going on because such a look gives them the opportunity to make a risk-free profit, since they know exactly what
Tags: ban, front-running, HFT Flash orders, market transparency, SEC
Posted in Phil's Favorites | No Comments »
Email This Post
|
Twitter
|
LinkedIn
|
del.icio.us
|
Google+ |
Conspiracy To Hide Bubble-Formation
by ilene - July 1st, 2009 1:33 pm
Conspiracy To Hide Bubble-Formation
Courtesy of Karl Denninger at The Market Ticker
In yet another move to make a mockery of so-called market transparency, and again with mad props to Zerohedge, we have this:
The Exchange has filed with the SEC to implement the decommissioning of the DPTR requirement following the July 10, 2009 trade date. Accordingly, the last required submission of the DPTR will be on July 14, 2009, which is the second business day after the last trade date for which the DPTR is required.
Go read the entire Zerohedge article; what this means, in short, is that the ability of people (like you and I) to see the fact that a handful of banks, most specifically Goldman Sachs, constitute the majority of NYSE trading volume – and they’re trading for their own book, not for customers, will no longer be disclosed.
This "back and forth trade" between a handful of institutions is nothing more than the old "pump and dump" game that has been played in the OTC market forever – and almost always screws the individual investor.
This is no different than you and I selling a house back and forth between us repeatedly, each time at a higher price. We both appear to be geniuses as we’re both making a "profit", right?
Well, no. One of us is destined to take a horrifying loss if we do not find a sucker to make the final transaction with.
The embedded scam is that real gains require real parties at interest and not a closed system of a couple of guys passing an asset back and forth in a transparent attempt to "bait" someone else into becoming the sucker to offload that asset to.
The parallels to the housing bubble are not coincidence. There is no "value" being created nor is there any actual value appreciation taking place when people pass an asset back and forth at ever-higher prices. Only when there are lots of parties participating on their own, organically, does a market truly exist and does value align with price. Otherwise the so-called "price" is nothing other than a cheap parlor trick.
Zerohedge has been documenting this game now for months as Goldman in particular has come to represent an outrageously large percentage of the entire NYSE volume.
The
Tags: Goldman Sachs, market transparency, NYSE, SEC, trading volume, Zero Hedge
Posted in Phil's Favorites | No Comments »
Email This Post
|
Twitter
|
LinkedIn
|
del.icio.us
|
Google+ |


Twitter
LinkedIn
del.icio.us


Philip R. Davis is a founder Phil's Stock World, a stock and options trading site that teaches the art of options trading to newcomers and devises advanced strategies for expert traders...









Ilene is editor and affiliate program
coordinator for PSW. She manages the Favorites backup site
(