Sign up today for an exclusive discount along with our 30-day GUARANTEE — Love us or leave, with your money back! Click here to become a part of our growing community and learn how to stop gambling with your investments. We will teach you to BE THE HOUSE — Not the Gambler!

Click here to see some testimonials from our members!

FINREG Dead?

FINREG Dead?

Courtesy of Karl Denninger at The Market Ticker 

BEVERLY HILLS, CA - DECEMBER 10:  U.S. Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI) attends the ACLU of Southern California annual Bill of Rights Dinner at the Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel December 10, 2007 in Beverly Hills, California.  (Photo by Stephen Shugerman/Getty Images)

Senator Feingold says:

"As I have indicated for some time now, my test for the financial regulatory reform bill is whether it will prevent another crisis.  The conference committee’s proposal fails that test and for that reason I will not vote to advance it.  During debate on the bill, I supported several efforts to break up ‘too big to fail’ Wall Street banks and restore the proven safeguards established after the Great Depression separating Main Street banks from big Wall Street firms, among other issues.  Unfortunately, these crucial reforms were rejected.  While there are some positive provisions in the final measure, the lack of strong reforms is clear confirmation that Wall Street lobbyists and their allies in Washington continue to wield significant influence on the process.”

Interesting. Note that:

Senator Feingold was one of eight senators to oppose the repeal of Glass-Steagall in 1999. Senator Feingold also opposed the Wall Street bail-out in 2008.

Oh my the balls are still there!

There are times when one Senator with a pair of church-ringers can make a difference.  This is one of them.

I have long said that Glass-Steagall, which was all of 37 pages, is more than sufficient to stuff the genie back in the bottle. Indeed, all of Mr. Feingold’s complaints would be addressed by simply reinstating it.

Yes, I know the banks would howl, and claim that "they’d all move to Britain."

Fine. Let ‘em.

If you know someone is playing around with the materials to blow up your economy, do you want them to do so in your country or somewhere else?  Clearly, we’d prefer to have that happen "somewhere else", right?

Banking should be a utility function.  Those institutions that want to play in the capital markets are free to do so, but they should NOT have access toany sort of support whatsoever – not from The Fed, not from Treasury, not from anyone but themselves. If they fail then they go under and everyone holding their paper takes a haircut (or worse.)

All this arm-waving and 2200 pages of legislation is another attempt to pass "you can see what the lobbyists stuck in it after you sign it" crap, just like it was with Health Care.

It is time for Congress to say not no but hell no along with the American people.

This is our nation and our government, and we’re tired of it.

Mr. Feingold has precisely the right idea.


Tags: , , , ,

Do you know someone who would benefit from this information? We can send your friend a strictly confidential, one-time email telling them about this information. Your privacy and your friend's privacy is your business... no spam! Click here and tell a friend!



Comments (reverse order)


    You must be logged in to make a comment.
    You can sign up for a membership or get a FREE Daily News membership or log in

    Sign up today for an exclusive discount along with our 30-day GUARANTEE — Love us or leave, with your money back! Click here to become a part of our growing community and learn how to stop gambling with your investments. We will teach you to BE THE HOUSE — Not the Gambler!

    Click here to see some testimonials from our members!


  1. my hat is off to you sir someone in washington does have good ole common sense. banks as a utility function is appropiate and to the point nothing more nothing less Glass-Stegall should be put back in place again my congrats to sound business thinking parris holmes