17.6 C
New York
Friday, May 29, 2026

TGIF – May’s Market Madness Ends With A Bang!

Blue Origin New Glenn rocket explodes into fireball during test launch in  FloridaWoopsie!  

While this image is from last night’s “anomaly” during a “Hotfire TEST” of Blue Origin’s New Glen rocket (a process where a rocket’s engines are ignited while it remains bolted to the launch pad) – it feels to me more like a meme for SpaceX’s upcoming IPO – which will also very likely explode investors capital in a similarly spectacular fashion

Estimates are for hundreds of Millions in damages and some insurance company is going to be crying over that one! But Bezos’ loss is also Elon’s pain as repairs to the Cape Canaveral Space Force Station are likely to take SEVERAL MONTHS!  

NASA administrator Jared Isaacman wrote the government space agency is “aware of the anomaly” involving the Blue Origin New Glenn test. “Spaceflight is unforgiving, and developing new heavy-lift launch capability is extraordinarily difficult. We will work with our partners to support a thorough investigation of this anomaly, assess near-term mission impacts, and get back to launching rockets.

Look, this IS rocket science – it’s very hard and there will be setbacks but consider that this is Blue Origin’s ONLY operational pad capable of launching the New Glenn rocket and it was SUPPOSED TO be carrying 48 Amazon Project Kuiper Internet satellites into space as part of an aggressive launch schedule that is now a good 3 months behind on their $2.7Bn contract to build low-Earth orbit systems.

Blue Origin is also contracted by Nasa to put rover vehicles on the moon as well as many other launch items in the Artemis Lunar Program. Remember when it took us 9 months to rescue those stranded astronauts? It would have really sucked for them had this happened along the way – there are no Kroger’s in space (yet).  

This is the RISK of investing in rocket companies – there is TREMENDOUS risk of failure and it can’t all be mitigated by insurance (and insurance is a big operating cost as well). EVERY time you launch a rocket you roll the dice and both SpaceX and Blue Origin plan to roll those dice over and over and over again – and accidents like this DO HAPPEN (see above image).  

🌪️ SpaceX has 4 launch facilities: 

    • Launch Complex 39A (LC-39A)Kennedy Space Center: This historic NASA pad is leased by SpaceX to launch Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy rockets. It is their only site currently equipped to launch Crew Dragon astronaut missions to the International Space Station. SpaceX has also constructed a massive launch tower here for its next-generation Starship megarocket. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
    • Space Launch Complex 40 (SLC-40)Cape Canaveral Space Force Station: This is SpaceX’s high-volume workhorse pad. It handles a massive share of the company’s weekly Falcon 9 commercial satellite deployments and Starlink internet launches. [1, 2, 3]
    • StarbaseBoca Chica (Texas): This is SpaceX’s fully private, vertically integrated production and launch facility dedicated entirely to the massive Starship program. The site features a massive manufacturing footprint, vehicle assembly buildings, and has recently expanded to include two active Starship launch pads to dramatically accelerate flight testing. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
    • Space Launch Complex 4 East (SLC-4E)Vandenberg Space Force Base: Located on the Pacific coastline, this facility handles Falcon 9 launches aimed at polar and high-inclination orbits. It is primarily used for Earth-observation satellites, defense payloads, and targeted West Coast Starlink shell deployments. [1, 2, 3]
US Rocket Launch Sites
 
Both companies have taken entirely different paths to rocket development, resulting in vastly different numbers of hardware losses. [1]
 
SpaceX embraces a “fail fast” methodology, intentionally blowing up dozens of cheap, uncrewed prototypes during testing to rapidly iterate. Blue Origin uses a conservative, slow development style, meaning they have far fewer total losses, but each failure is high-stakes and financially crippling. [1, 2]
 

Total Complete Rocket Loss Counts
  • SpaceX: 15+ Total Rocket Losses (5 operational orbital failures, plus 10+ high-altitude Starship prototype explosions).
  • Blue Origin: 4 Total Rocket Losses (1 suborbital New Shepard booster, 2 New Glenn upper stages/boosters, and 1 full New Glenn vehicle on the pad). [1]

Complete Failure Timeline & Cost Estimates
 
The timeline below tracks total launch vehicle losses (excluding partial failures where the primary payload safely reached orbit).
 
Early Era: The Struggle to Reach Orbit (2006–2008)
  • March 2006 (SpaceX – Falcon 1 Flight 1): The rocket suffered an engine fire and crashed 25 seconds after liftoff.
    • Estimated Cost: $7 million – $10 million (loss of the rocket and a defense satellite). [1, 2, 3]

  • March 2007 (SpaceX – Falcon 1 Flight 2): The second-stage engine shut down prematurely due to fuel sloshing, failing to reach orbit.
    • Estimated Cost: $6 million – $8 million. [1, 2, 3]

  • August 2008 (SpaceX – Falcon 1 Flight 3): A stage-separation collision destroyed the rocket and its payloads (including NASA hardware).
    • Estimated Cost: $10 million+ (nearly bankrupted the company). [1, 2]

Operational Era: Commercial Disasters (2015–2016)
  • June 2015 (SpaceX – Falcon 9 CRS-7): An overpressurized helium tank caused the rocket to disintegrate 2 minutes after liftoff, destroying an ISS cargo ship.
    • Estimated Cost: $110 million (roughly $60M for the rocket and $50M for the lost NASA cargo). [1, 2]

  • September 2016 (SpaceX – Amos-6 Pad Explosion): A Falcon 9 exploded during fueling on the launch pad two days before launch, destroying Israel’s Amos-6 satellite.
    • Estimated Cost: $260 million ($60M rocket plus a massive $200M commercial satellite). [1, 2]

The Suborbital Interlude (2022)
  • September 2022 (Blue Origin – New Shepard NS-23): An engine nozzle structural failure triggered the automated abort system. The passenger capsule parachuted safely to the ground, but the booster crashed and was completely destroyed.
    • Estimated Cost: $20 million – $30 million (suborbital boosters are smaller but highly reused). [1]

Starship Development & New Glenn Entry (2020–2025)
  • 2020–2021 (SpaceX – Starship Prototypes SN8, SN9, SN10, SN11): A series of early Starship upper-stage prototypes successfully flew to high altitudes but exploded during dramatic landing attempts.
    • Estimated Cost: $15M – $20M per prototype (totaling roughly $60 million – $80 million). SpaceX expected these losses as part of development. [1]

  • 2023–2025 (SpaceX – Full Starship Integrated Tests): Multiple fully stacked Starship vehicles (Starship + Super Heavy booster) blew up during flight or disintegrated during high-velocity atmospheric re-entry.
    • Estimated Cost: $90 million – $130 million per stack (totaling an estimated $400 million+ across multiple flight tests). [1, 2]

  • January 2025 (Blue Origin – New Glenn Flight 1): While the upper stage successfully delivered its payload into orbit, the massive first-stage booster crashed into the Atlantic Ocean drone ship during its landing attempt.
    • Estimated Cost: $80 million – $100 million (the cost of manufacturing a heavy-lift booster). [1, 2]

Analysis of the causes and consequences of launch failures over the past 20  years - ScienceDirectThe Modern String of Setbacks (2026)
  • April 2026 (Blue Origin – New Glenn Flight 3): A cryogenic failure in the upper stage left the AST SpaceMobile “Bluebird 7” satellite in an unusable, ultra-low orbit, where it burned up days later.
    • Estimated Cost: $140 million+ (roughly $40M for the lost upper stage hardware and up to $100M in commercial liability/satellite loss). [1, 2, 3]

  • May 28, 2026 (Blue Origin – New Glenn Ground Hotfire): Last night’s cataclysmic explosion completely vaporized a brand-new New Glenn rocket on the pad and decimated Launch Complex 36’s infrastructure.
    • Estimated Cost: $350 million – $500 million+ (combining a $120M+ full heavy-lift vehicle, hundreds of millions in infrastructure destruction, and massive contractual delay penalties). [1]

 
Again, I am not against Space Exploration but I’m not too keen on Space Commercialization because future generations will have to clean up the mess these companies are making in their race to one-up each other.  I’m also against paying 200 times REVENUES for a SpaceX IPO when these and other risks are always in play.  
 
In fact, the FAA recently GROUNDED SpaceX’s Starship rocket fleet, rejecting ALL further launch approvals until the company completes a mandatory “Formal Mishap Investigation.” That’s very unfortunate for a company that likes to say “Move Fast, Break Things,” isn’t it?  
 
The suspension blocks SpaceX from moving forward with its upcoming Flight 13 mission due to a critical first-stage booster failure that occurred during the debut of its Starship Version 3 (V3) rocket on May 22nd (gosh, these things happen A LOT!) in Texas, when the launch was successful but the landing – not so much…  
 
Several of the booster’s Raptor engines failed (“conked out“) during its descent back to Earth. Instead of achieving a controlled splashdown or landing, the booster hit the water hard, triggering a massive explosion over the Gulf of Mexico.
 
Fortunately, no people were harmed but MASSIVE environmental damage – which could have caused additional hundreds of Millions in damages and this MANDATORY safety review can last a few weeks to a few months – not great news when you are holding your 1,000x earnings SpaceX stock and the earnings begin to dwindle right before your eyes…
 
 
Speaking of rockets in danger of exploding: The S&P 500 is up 5% for the very merry month of May and that’s +$3.5 TRILLION and they accomplished this amazing feat with ONLY about $130 billion of actual inflows – isn’t that great???
 
🌪️ Estimated Monthly Inflows (Major S&P 500 ETFs)
 
Data reflects the rolling 30-day period ending mid-to-late May 2026.

Ticker ETF Name Estimated Monthly Inflows Trend Context
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF +$16.1 Billion Consistent leader; led all funds with $4B inflow week ending May 22.
SPY SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust +$10.6 Billion heavily traded; saw a massive $16.76B surge mid-April to mid-May.
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF +$6.1 Billion Steady inflows, though trailing VOO and SPY in volume this month.
Total Top 3 S&P 500 ETFs ~$32.8 Billion Aggregated Estimate
 
Quantifying Other Inflows into the S&P 500
 
While ETF flows fluctuate based on daily sentiment, these other sources operate as programmatic, recurring, or automated inflows.
 

Source Type [1, 2, 3, 4] Estimated Monthly Flow (S&P 500 Portion) Flow Directing Mechanism
Corporate Stock Buybacks +$83.0 Billion to +$88.0 Billion Direct company-financed share repurchases.
Dividend Reinvestment (DRIP) +$22.0 Billion to +$27.0 Billion Automated index-payout recycling by shareholders.
Passive & S&P 500 Mutual Funds -$15.0 Billion to -$25.0 Billion (Net Negative) Systematic shift out of mutual funds and into ETFs.
Direct Institutional Mandates +$10.0 Billion to +$15.0 Billion Large pension/sovereign direct equity allocations.
Total Alternative Net Inflow ~+$90.0 Billion Combined Structural Buying Impact
 
Yet SpaceX wants to raise $100Bn in one day next month. THIS is our #1 market fear at the moment – what will be liquidated to accommodate a $2Tn IPO? May has gotten a hall pass on promises of the War winding down and SpaceX and Open AI IPOs driving interest in the market but what if those things DON’T happen in June? 
 
What’s the strategy then?  
 

It’s been a fantastic month but 7 of the 11 sectors in the S&P 500 are DOWN for the month as this is a very narrowly focused rally and, when you put all your eggs in one basket – they could end up blowing up on the launch pad.

We’ll be adjusting our hedges in the Live Member Chat Room later today – don’t miss it!

Have a great weekend, 

— Phil & the team

 

3 COMMENTS

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Stay Connected

148,941FansLike
396,312FollowersFollow
2,690SubscribersSubscribe

Latest Articles

3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x